Skip to playerSkip to main content
"Time to Refresh" ist ein Kanal, der bewusst Zuschauer irre fuehrt. Ich decke die Falschaussagen auf.

#Apologet #Islam #Muslim #Reaktion



Links zu Atheismus TV

Youtube https://www.youtube.com/@AtheismusTV
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/AtheismusTV
Tiktok https://www.tiktok.com/@atheismustv
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/atheismustv



Quellen:

Wortdefinitionen
www.dwds.de

Kommunikationsmodell
https://karrierebibel.de/kommunikation/

Beweis Beleg
https://www.ardalpha.de/lernen/telekolleg/faecher/deutsch/sprachkompetenz/12-textanlyseunderoerterung-100.html

Muhammad
https://www.spiegel.de/lebenundlernen/uni/disput-unter-islamwissenschaftlern-hat-mohammed-wirklich-gelebt-a-578513.html

https://www.religionen-im-gespraech.de/damfiles/default/religionen_im_gespraech/pdf-dokumente/religionen_im_gespraech_27.2017_mohammed.pdf-6ae748f54f27ff3a293e2f811f8a7bd5.pdf


Bookshelf
https://www.pinterest.de/pin/23643966784497333



Copyright:

The usage of this footage follows the guidelines as laid out in section 107 (Fair Use) of the Copyright Act 1976 as it is used exclusively for analysis and criticism for non-profit educational purposes and thus does not require any permission from anyone.

This video contains transformative information, does not infringe on the target audience of the critiqued material, is non-commercial, uses only the minimum, required material and thus does not infringe any copyright laws. It provides either a review, a comment, criticism, parody, education, satire or all of the aforementioned. Abusive take-down notices will be countered.

It is pretty obviously fair use. It's being used for criticism, education and commentary, and in order to make that work, it needs to show clips of the video.

Copyright and Fair Use
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107

Creative Commons attribution non-commercial no derivatives license (CC BY-NC-ND)

Category

😹
Fun
Transcript
00:05Hey, hello and welcome to a reaction to a video on the Time to Refresh channel,
00:13So, time to refresh or update or whatever. A video has been published there.
00:19It has been given the title, and so far no one has been able to refute this evidence for Islam.
00:29Hey, you know why they lie so blatantly? I don't understand it. First of all, that's not proof.
00:37And secondly, everything they claim has already been refuted a thousand times over. How can...
00:42so shamelessly, without blushing, without any indication that there was anything there, that they were
00:50It's shameful that they sit there and lie to people, simply to make them feel good.
00:58to give. Simply because Muslims like to hear, yes, Islam is right and everything that is in it.
01:03The Quran says so, right? No, it doesn't. I just don't understand why people are like that.
01:12Something can be done? Why do other people cheat so brazenly? I just don't understand it.
01:19Were we confronted with evidence? No, of course not. But then with proof? No, not even that.
01:27No. They are just unsubstantiated claims, and very vague ones at that. Is that...?
01:36What was in their video, a seven-hour, seven-hour mammoth ham, what
01:43Has this claim ever been disproven? Of course, a thousand times over. It's...
01:49Baby, it's easy to refute that. How could they release a video like that? I understand.
01:54No. And what they unfortunately completely ignore is reality, the truth.
02:03They don't even realize that they're stuck in their own little bubble, and that they somehow consider it...
02:11to hold their entire reality. And someone like me is swimming in a vast ocean and from
02:18...looks in from the outside. And they believe they're living in reality, that that's all there is to it. Well, well,
02:27Normally I find stuff like that quite funny. But these two idiots have no clue.
02:33of what they claim, what they consider miracles, what they consider
02:38Using words and how to analyze all of that correctly. But we already know this from extensive
02:45Studies nowadays show that the brain tries to defend what it clings to.
02:51And it takes discipline and open-mindedness to break through that. And they can't do that.
02:59And instead, they're lying through their teeth. It's insane. It's really very strange.
03:06What's happening in this video is a complete disaster and utterly pointless. Seven
03:15Spending hours just rambling on about nonsense. But okay, it's true. Muslims are happy about that.
03:20Any confirmation, no matter how trivial. No matter what is claimed. No matter how embarrassing and how
03:27The choice of words is amateurish. I'll try to do better and show what's wrong here.
03:35It's happening. That means it's first about definitions, so we know what we're even talking about.
03:41Then some statements from the video, and only then my personal opinion on them. So, the video.
03:47It was cobbled together from various recordings and is therefore almost seven hours long.
03:53have become. And therefore I will only pick out and show the principles that are mentioned at the beginning,
04:00What all is going wrong here. Because that shows the concept and what happens in the later sections.
04:05It's merely repeated, only with different examples, and then explained again. And that one guy, he...
04:12Yes, I was invited to a mock conversation. But then I immediately pointed out that a camera was running.
04:20Of course, we know that this won't happen, because it's common knowledge that critics of Islam...
04:27They are threatened very quickly, and some followers of the Islamic cult do not shy away from acts of violence.
04:35And I don't want to have to constantly walk around with bodyguards or be carried out in the street with
04:40Being stabbed with a knife? Honestly, no. And that's why I remain as anonymous as possible.
04:46And the video discussion between us will never be possible because I only have time for this.
04:53I would have to risk my life. It's actually that serious. So that's complete nonsense.
05:00They're terrified of someone who knows a bit about Islam.
05:04On the other hand, I sincerely hope that Muslims will also see this video of mine, because
05:10Here are some very popular claims that are quickly proven to be false.
05:16or errors can be uncovered. And everyone really needs to recognize that very quickly.
05:22can. And it would be worthwhile to somehow compare truth and falsehood.
05:29to be able to ask. I mean, they're not seriously going to claim that it's a human being.
05:34has been given, who claimed 1400 years ago that he could send messages directly and personally
05:40to receive one from a god. That would be absurd.
05:44More than 1400 years ago, a person came along who simply said, yes, I receive messages.
05:51from God.
05:51From God.
05:52Exactly.
05:52They're not seriously claiming that Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, spoke about...
05:59which, since there is nothing historically usable, is very well documented?
06:05So I believe there is no person in the history of mankind who has been so...
06:08It is recorded and documented, like the Prophet Mohammed.
06:11Yes, but not that they actually testify, i.e., confirm and personally affirm,
06:18that a human being actually existed as a messenger of a god 1400 years ago. Because how can...
06:26Can anyone attest to that today?
06:29I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of one God.
06:33Yes, I could go on endlessly and show examples where things are truly absurd.
06:39and the impossible is just blurted out. But they don't have that kind of shortage.
06:45They didn't do it themselves, they just repeat something they picked up somewhere, but
06:50They haven't grasped the content. They can't substantiate it either; they're just babbling.
06:55It's just after. Okay, so I'll make an exception and start from the beginning with what we call a conversation.
07:02To this end, we humans have so far reached a very high level of communication.
07:07brought that. Unfortunately, not in all cases. We need to understand that content, that is, the word itself,
07:15that this is stated, but then brought up again by the host and then
07:21only then will it be filled with content. And therefore we should strive to use words as accurately as possible.
07:28to find, so that the intended content is correctly unpacked and fully understood.
07:35The interesting thing is, very, very interesting, the interesting thing is, only here such terms are used
07:39How interesting. They try every few minutes. Which means, of course, to arouse interest. But what it actually is.
07:47not doing it, because it's either trivial or wrong. So if we can prove that he doesn't
07:54who said the immayment, neither in the form of a conscious lie nor in the form of an unconscious one
08:00If it's a lie, then only one option remains: that he told the truth.
08:05has. Or the word lie. A lie is a statement that is deliberately false in order to deceive others.
08:14to defraud. Since fraud is often associated with financial loss, one can also deliberately commit it.
08:20Whether to deceive or betray someone, say who prefers that. The point is, it is
08:27It's impossible to lie by mistake. A statement is either true or false, or—and this is what's being discussed here—
08:35Completely omitted, someone is mistaken. And the word definition, in case anyone wants to look it up,
08:43They come almost exclusively from the DBDS, the German dictionary of the German language.
08:48And it literally says that a lie, and I quote, a deliberately false statement about
08:54It's about deceiving others. That much is perfectly clear. You can't do it by accident.
08:59If I now apply this to a case involving Mohammed, then the law can be...
09:04Simply put, according to the Quran, the sum is two-thirds, one-eighth, and twice.
09:10One-sixth equals one, as I'm showing here. Is that correct? No, it's mathematically
09:16Clearly wrong. So, what does that mean? Well, either the God of Muhammad.
09:22said something to him that was wrong, or Mohammed misunderstood it, or Mohammed
09:29It was invented. And in my view, that makes more sense than asking whether something is a lie.
09:35And, oh dear, the word "proof" is really only used in mathematics. Therefore, one should
09:42We use the term "proof" or "evidence". But I know that colloquially, "proof" is usually understood as "evidence".
09:48It is considered to mean that something is as claimed. In other words, it is a synonym for proof.
09:55However, this sloppy use of language is a recurring theme in all of these two videos.
10:00Heroes. I have already corrected several false statements, both in the comments and in
10:07other videos. I don't even know if I've already made one or two about the
10:11People here on this channel. But their learning ability is severely limited. Also, it seems a
10:18There is a very high level of resistance to advice. Since everything claimed here has long been...
10:25It has been refuted and exposed as false. Surely everyone should know that. But
10:30That doesn't stop them from repeating every bit of nonsense. Because Muslims like to have things confirmed.
10:37They will. Because Islam is so weak. And it doesn't matter how little truth it contains.
10:43is.
10:44The interesting thing is, his following hasn't diminished in the last 1400 years. Very, very.
10:49Interesting. There are more and more of them.
10:50Yes, the usual thing with the 1400 years. But for the sake of the video, I'll just assume...
10:56that an Ahmed or Mohammed or whatever, as always, just as he is described in the Sunna
11:03It will be assumed that he actually existed. Even though there is absolutely no evidence of it. But
11:07Muslims believe that nevertheless, and I won't go into that any further, they also follow
11:12I am referring to Tim, the traditional Islamic fairy tale, with its revelation and then the traditions.
11:19According to Islamic scholars, the figure of Mohammed is considered authentic.
11:26classified secondary literature claims to have beheaded, enslaved, tortured, raped and killed.
11:35Whether women or children. Because they were with the enemy. At least in my eyes.
11:42He's not such a great guy. The video makes some outrageous claims.
11:49Good grief, we all know those things aren't true. But they're being used here without...
11:54Scruples or moral inhibitions simply repeated. No, Islam is not growing. It is
12:00The fastest-shrinking religion. Islam simply doesn't fit into the 21st century.
12:07And certainly not to Europe. And surveys, even among Muslims, repeatedly show that
12:14They generally hardly practice anymore and actually want their peace and freedom. The social
12:22However, the pressure is extremely high, so many simply pretend to be okay, just to avoid problems.
12:29to avoid them. Estimates suggest that 30% of the population in areas influenced by Islam are non-Muslims.
12:36Countries like Saudi Arabia or Qatar or whatever. I mean, you have to see that for yourself.
12:42Let it melt in your mouth. Go to a mosque, you Muslims. There, every third person is in the...
12:47The person who goes to the mosque is no longer a proper Muslim. He doesn't pray regularly, doesn't fast, and is otherwise...
12:54not particularly impressed by everything in the Quran. Young Muslims are said to be...
13:00It could even be much more. Converts drop out after just a few weeks. That's just how it is.
13:06So much so that almost 90% of the world's population is not convinced of the God of Islam. What has been observed
13:15The idea is that if one million Muslims emigrate to Germany, then the
13:22Two were added in Germany, but not deducted in their home countries. That's how it works.
13:28Of course. But yes, yes, okay.
13:32So I believe there is no person in the history of mankind who has been so...
13:35It is recorded and documented, like the Prophet Mohammed.
13:37And no, no matter how much Muslims might wish it, neither Moses nor Jesus nor Mohammed are historical figures.
13:45Occupied persons. Kids, you have to accept that sometime. Mohammed already did.
13:50Not at all, because the sin is simply invented. And even Islamic scholars are known to dismiss it.
13:56The accounts told by other scholars show the greatest distance from the truthfulness of the traditions.
14:07If they believe that the Sunna has been preserved through the Hadiths, they must be one
14:11They follow a specific epistemology, a specific paradigm. They are aware that
14:16No one in science has confirmed the Muslim and Sunni science of Hadiths.
14:20Nobody. She is considered completely discredited.
14:23They are just fairy tales, as I was able to clearly demonstrate using the example of Buchali. Therefore...
14:29All the nonsense, exaggerations, and blatant lies are simply stories.
14:35Myths and legends. These are simply passed down from generation to generation. And many of these
14:44We know these stories from the narratives of civilizations that have existed for thousands of years.
14:48lived before Islam. Talking animals are also not uncommon. But the lie about poison on
14:57one of the wings on a fly and the antidote on the other wing, that's what else I have
15:03I couldn't find it anywhere. But it must exist somewhere. Islam just copies everything, after all. Why not?
15:10That too? What I'd like to briefly mention is that a book or a quote from a book is not, in itself, proof.
15:18The fact that a particular first name is more common in a few countries today has no evidentiary value whatsoever.
15:25Any claim. Because just because many people believe something doesn't make it proof. And it's not
15:31Proof that it's true. That a person says something is completely irrelevant. Utterly irrelevant.
15:38Whether scholar or not. Whether scientist or not. It must be verifiable. Verifiable and
15:47Falsifiable. Ideally, proven and verified through experiments. Tested. Including what I say here.
15:57Please check it. I can't provide evidence for every sentence here, but I will.
16:03attempt,
16:03when it comes to a specific sentence. Otherwise, it simply becomes too much. There are millions, and that's not even the most complex issue.
16:09not
16:09Exaggerated. I don't know, there are statistics and so on, you can see that too. Millions of
16:13People who simply know the Quran by heart. Word for word, letter for letter. And in the end, it...
16:19It has actually been pointed out that not a single word, not a single letter of the Quran has been omitted for so many years.
16:25It simply hasn't been changed. Even Osman's copy of the Quran was found, and it's clear he went to Egypt.
16:32It's being sent. You can watch the video on Arte's YouTube channel. And there you can see he weighs 80 kilograms.
16:38Okay? It's been preserved, after all. And they've simply documented that in this report. If you look at
16:43YouTube writes, the origin of the Quran and its secrets, Arte, documentary, can one come to this conclusion and learn
16:49Take a look. Very, very interesting. I would recommend it to everyone. This one is also completely irrelevant because nobody knows which
16:57The version of the Quran was used as a basis. Today we still have dozens of versions, some with significant differences.
17:04differing content. Even Islamic scholars have to admit that now. I have some here, these are like this.
17:11Screenshots from the Play Store or App Store, or I don't know where. There are different versions of the Quran there that you can download.
17:19It can be downloaded with different content. The thing is, there is no original or initial version.
17:27of the Quran. Therefore, we cannot know if, and if so, which one is correct. The Quran, therefore,
17:35like others
17:36It has also undergone an evolutionary process across various editions. The old Laia of Kiraat and Aruf, which today...
17:45Nor is it anymore. Because today it is known that the Quran consists of fragments that were pieced together over many centuries.
17:52were collected. Initially as an Arabic version of Jesus, of Christianity, and then later, when that was not the case.
18:00was accepted as competition to Judaism and Christianity. Because both groups rejected it, and then...
18:09They resorted to violent oppression, which continues to this day. This hatred of Jews, which
18:16This didn't happen by chance. But it also means that the Quran is an Abbasid Quran, which dates back to the 8th century.
18:24was assembled, which is due to the complete lack of structure and chaotic arrangement with various
18:29Text forms explained. And it wasn't until the 9th or 10th century that the first complete versions appeared.
18:36Finished. Although there were also editions with 111 or 120 chapters instead of the current 114. And that
18:44That would also explain the 29 letter phrases in the Quran, which turn out to be simple paraphrases, which then
18:51Originally, they were simply copied and pasted into the text by scribblers who barely knew Arabic.
18:57They could. But just how brazenly stupid the apologists for Time to Refresh are, just how brazenly stupid they are, I'll show you with a
19:06short
19:07Example. You're not supposed to believe this is even possible. So again, they claim that the Quran has been
19:14Unchanged for 1400 years. Why 1400? It's already silly enough, because we don't really have any...
19:22Information is received, and the date changes every year. That means 1400, however, remains the same. For decades.
19:28Always 1400. But if we calculate backwards, that can't be right. Because if I look at it ten years ago...
19:35If I had done that, then Mohammed had only just begun. And then they say it should be the Uthmanic Quran.
19:41It must have been a complete Quran. Without any differences from the modern Quran. It was even the original copy of the Quran.
19:48Osman found it and sent it to Egypt. You can find the video on Arte's YouTube channel.
19:54Take a look and you can see it weighs 80 kilograms. Okay? It's still intact and that...
20:00They simply documented it in this documentary. When you write on YouTube, the origin of the
20:04The Quran and its secrets, Arte, documentaries – you can find out about them and watch them. Very, very
20:09Interesting. I would recommend it to everyone. They cite a source for it. But if I...
20:16The source information provided by them, when I check it, is not included in the video.
20:21They didn't talk about the entire Quran, but about a few pages. With significant differences.
20:28to the modern Quran, to the current versions. And, and this is the important part, to material dated,
20:35which suggests that this was approximately 30 years after Uttmann's death, who was allegedly murdered here in 656 CE.
20:45Well, nothing about that is correct. For the first time, a manuscript has now been examined.
20:50found a version that has a different order of surahs than the canonically valid one.
20:56The surahs are arranged differently. Furthermore, there are palim zests, fragments where the original text is missing.
21:01The text was removed and replaced with a new one. And there are foreign, non-Arabic words.
21:06Words. In plain terms, this means there are significant differences to the Quran we know today.
21:12The Quran, like all other holy books, must therefore have a history. In the early
21:16Over the 100 years of Islam, the text of the Quran, its written form, its arrangement, has apparently changed.
21:20continuously evolving.
21:21Therefore, there is no first or original Quran. There is no Uttmann Quran. That means,
21:27The two of them are mocking Muslims with pranks and paint. Their own source is refuted.
21:32The insane claims they make. The first complete Quran I know of.
21:37It has 114 chapters and is similar to the Quran we have in our hands today.
21:42from the late 9th or early 10th century. And it was then captured in Egypt in 1924.
21:52However, it wasn't codified until, I believe, 1984. That means the Quran is younger.
21:58than me. Yeah, but try telling that to a Muslim. He'll just say, yeah. And what's next?
22:09What surprised me greatly was that both of them listed the Corpus Coranicum. Because
22:15There's a whole section there dedicated solely to variants of the Quran. They're being polite, of course.
22:22These are referred to as readings, but show significant differences in wording over the centuries.
22:28And this extends into modern times. Depending on the person and their interpretation. That is to say,
22:34The Quran was never truly codified. Although this so-called standard version exists.
22:39from 1924, the Cairo version according to Asim, who is supposed to recite it.
22:48They have it, and it has been adopted as the version of the Quran. However, according to scholars, it is not the strongest version.
22:54and it wasn't the best version that was being touted at the time. But that's the one they went with.
22:59And the Quran itself clearly shows that it was people who invented it,
23:05who developed, collected, and summarized the Quran over time. And that
23:10It has nothing to do with Kirat or Aruf, as is often claimed. Ask around, dear Muslim.
23:15Let's take an example from the Quran, using Kirat and Aruf, and highlighting the differences.
23:21Yes, and that's where it ends. After almost half an hour of rambling about meaningless things.
23:26Now, after all the banter, we're getting down to brass tacks. How many prophets were there? Well, 25. Here,
23:34Adam, David, Noah, and so on. It's in the Quran. No, not really. There are only 23.
23:4025. But there were more? How many more? And where were they?
23:47The Almighty sent prophets. There is a tradition about their number.
23:52It said 124,000 prophets. Or exactly 124,000 or 224,000 prophets were sent.
23:58So it's not just these 25.
23:59Well, these are the so-called precise details that non-Muslims need to recognize,
24:08What is the divine origin of Islam? 100,000 more or less, what difference does that make?
24:15And especially back then, when hardly anyone lip-synced, were the prophets also in Iceland?
24:20And what language did they speak?
24:24Icelandic? Learned in Mecca?
24:26Or did they just talk to the poor Icelanders in Old Arabic, who of course didn't understand anything?
24:32According to § 14 and sentence 4, this is supposed to have actually taken place.
24:38that every nation has its prophet.
24:43We just don't know.
24:45And Allah today, he doesn't move either.
24:47And prophets, one could perhaps also say, are special people.
24:51who were personally commissioned by God to deliver his message to the people.
24:55Here in the Time to Refresh video, things happen very quickly.
25:00Now even the good Allah is being accused of incompetence and inability.
25:05because a god needs prophets to spread his message.
25:10An omniscient and omnipotent God should be able to do that much better.
25:15Instead, he sends 100, 100,000, or 200,000 prophets who fail miserably.
25:25so that messengers have to be sent after them, who fail miserably,
25:29so that a book has to be written, which also fails miserably.
25:33Although it's written in there, it's clear and obvious, and yet nobody understands it.
25:35So scholars have to be brought in to explain what a book, the messengers, and the prophets have tried to do in vain.
25:43and what even a god cannot create.
25:45Namely, to deliver the message.
25:48What message?
25:50Well, now pray and praise my name, or else. Amen.
25:55He got the message, you see.
25:58But Otto is unfortunately not omnipresent and cannot explain this to everyone.
26:03But why no one else?
26:05Especially since all of that happened a thousand years ago and I can't find a prophet today.
26:11Nor is she a prophetess.
26:13Why not, indeed?
26:15I would listen more to a female prophet than a male one.
26:20And the idea that Mohammed was sent for all believers, for all people, for all of humanity, is nonsense.
26:28He never left his small region, just a few square kilometers.
26:34According to the texts, anyway.
26:36He wasn't, he never was, according to the texts he wasn't even in the region at that time.
26:43Palestine.
26:43Or in Egypt, or in Japan, or in South America, or in Australia, well, it doesn't matter.
26:52So, a whole separate chapter in the video is about Aisha, a small child.
27:00And this chapter actually talks about this child marriage.
27:05And here you can see very clearly how Islam can turn people into immoral, indecent, and corrupt people.
27:17In Islam, besides the primary literature, i.e. the Quran, there is secondary literature, the Sunnah.
27:24According to some Islamic scholars, it should even be part of the primary literature.
27:30This is therefore not a wish list, but an enormously important part of Islam.
27:37because here the Quran is continued, explained and implemented.
27:41Among these traditions, some of which are said to have taken place over centuries, are
27:49some collections that have been classified as true, as authentic, by Islamic scholars.
27:56And some of these stories are about Mohammed's marriage to a child, six-year-old Aisha.
28:05Mohammed was already 50 years old at this time.
28:09And then three years later, according to these sources of Islam, which are considered authentic,
28:15Mohammed, now 54 years old, is said to have consummated his marriage with nine-year-old Aisha, as they say.
28:23It is said to have taken place after Aisha's menstrual period.
28:29which is neither mentioned in the texts, nor can it serve as an excuse or justification.
28:36I, as a non-Muslim, find it highly reprehensible, disgusting and repulsive.
28:43The Islam apologists in the video do not.
28:46They're trying to excuse it, they're throwing things out now because it suits them so well.
28:52Remove all scholarly opinions, including texts deemed authentic.
28:58and claim that Aisha was already 18.
29:02Which in my eyes is still morally reprehensible, but no longer illegal.
29:07Can everyone now interpret the hadiths however they like, or only...
29:13What if it is no longer considered proper today to marry children or to trade or own people?
29:20Which, according to these texts, Mohammed is also said to have done.
29:24Everyone does it however they like.
29:26But that would show precisely that Muslims do not use the Quran as the basis for their behavior.
29:34but rather one's own morality, that of one's genes, upbringing, environment, and society.
29:43Because they decide whether what is written in the traditions, that Aisha was nine years old,
29:50That wasn't quite right, so we'd rather make it 18.
29:53That makes more sense.
29:56Oh, by the way, my former co-host, Gene Tonicsha, chose this very topic for his doctoral thesis.
30:03and showed that these traditions were simply inventions.
30:07Like everything else, only in this case it has been clearly proven.
30:12Well, but this video continues merrily along like this.
30:15Absurd, abhorrent, repulsive claims without moral facts or evidence.
30:21I think I'll leave it at that.
30:24I've had enough.
30:25The pointless rambling just keeps going.
30:28Constantly with that incredibly annoying background music.
30:33So, if Muslims are somehow affirmed by this,
30:37Then they are very superficial people.
30:41Then it's not well-founded, then it's not supported by any evidence.
30:45but simply wishful thinking.
30:47Therefore, my commentary on the conclusion is very short.
30:50In their video, the two apologists for Islam merely make absurd claims.
30:55Claims.
30:56No evidence is provided, and certainly no proof.
31:00Everything claimed in the video has been repeatedly and categorically refuted by any number of skeptics.
31:08It is shameful to watch two people for almost seven hours,
31:14how they just talk complete nonsense,
31:18who only make unsubstantiated claims,
31:21who only lie, as if they were printed,
31:24who are unable to
31:27to speak truthfully and responsibly about their faith.
31:32Well, so I'll stay,
31:34Because I think rationally, logically, and critically.
31:37and truth is important to me
31:39I will remain a person without belief in gods.
31:42Ciao from au!
31:44Ciao!
31:44Ciao!
31:45Ciao!
31:51Ciao!
Comments

Recommended