00:00We filed a response, objecting, noting that Mr. Woods has a constitutional right to privacy in the records.
00:06In the response, we acknowledge that that privacy right is not absolute.
00:12I'm requesting that as part of the order authorizing the issues of the subpoena,
00:17that the order include that the records obtained by the state can be shared by their law enforcement people,
00:24their experts, share with me and no one else.
00:28The state, in good faith, cannot object to the defendant's assertion that while the state is legally entitled to the
00:33records,
00:34the defendant still maintains a constitutional privacy interest in the prescription records as it pertains to the general public.
Commentaires