00:04We are concerned about the amount of mar that we have received and the location of the median line that
00:11we have defined as limit.
00:14We intend to graphic ourselves in this moment to be able to make some clear concepts about the affectation.
00:21Now, if they were not in danger, because they were not in danger from the point of view of Colombian,
00:28but they were not in danger.
00:33You said that they were going to lose a large amount of water.
00:39That's where the richness of the archipelago.
00:42That's what the AIA said.
00:44In this moment, the court said,
00:45to establish the limits different from the 82,
00:49which was what we had,
00:51and every point of view that we had before the Meridiano 82,
00:56we talked about a loss.
00:58To be able to predict how much continental territory we lost,
01:01is what we are going to do right now,
01:03to be able to make declarations in that sense.
01:05But that line that was drawn on Quitasueño,
01:08worried about you?
01:08You said before,
01:09and you can see clearly that we lost.
01:13Precisely,
01:14that was the media media that we had,
01:16we had a certain inquietud
01:17and that was generated in terms of fishing,
01:21especially the industrial,
01:23without stopping to contemplate the artisanal
01:25that could be able to generate
01:27processes of development
01:28typical like the one that is present in Providence
01:31with the cooperatives.
01:32So it has been a concern
01:33and it is now a reality,
01:36that is a concern because
01:37it has been lost
01:38and it has been lost
01:39in terms of the insular
01:40to what the department is referring to.
01:43Colombia has to change its policy,
01:44the president has to reunify with you
01:46and see how to help the pescadores
01:48that are going to be,
01:49of course,
01:49the president has announced
01:52its presence in the territory
01:55from the afternoon
01:57and in different scenarios
01:59to meet with the pescadores
02:01a request that was presented
02:03to the president of the Republic
02:05in the social dialogue
02:06that had been done in San Andrés.
02:09The view has to be different,
02:11it has to be different,
02:13it has to be coherent
02:14and as we have been feeling
02:16and now,
02:17it has to be reinforced
02:18the criteria
02:18with which it is linked
02:21to the community
02:22in San Andrés.
02:24My name is Juan Ramirez Dawkins.
02:29How do you think it was
02:30with this failure?
02:31How do you interpret it?
02:31I think it was very bad.
02:34The fact that we have maintained
02:37the North,
02:39Quitasueño, Alburqueque
02:40and Serranilla
02:41that doesn't mean that we have won
02:43we have lost
02:44we have lost
02:44because if the line of 82
02:48is reduced
02:51in favor of Nicaragua
02:52that means that we have lost
02:54we have lost
02:57lots of spaces
02:58in the traditional practices
03:00of our fishing
03:02where our fishermen
03:04have exercised
03:05sovereignty
03:05and the community of Raizal
03:06the family of Raizal
03:08historically
03:08and now
03:09the things have changed
03:11we have to study
03:11detailed
03:12what happened
03:15in the court
03:16international
03:16of the court.
03:17If you refer to
03:18the area of Luna Verde
03:19the upper part
03:20of Quitasueño
03:21according to that
03:22we have lost
03:23We have lost
03:25space
03:25we have lost
03:26where we are
03:27I have lost
03:28I have had
03:28I have lost
03:29my Pizza
03:30we have lost
03:33have gone and�
Comments