00:12Meet the Meerkats is a documentary series produced by Plimsoll Productions for Discovery Plus.
00:18The series follows rescued meerkat families learning to survive in the wild. These animals
00:23are not truly wild. They have been rescued from the illegal wildlife trade and are being introduced
00:29into the wild for the first time. We have uncovered evidence of likely staged scenes involving clear
00:35risks to animals and ethical compromises and we will present that evidence in this video.
00:43Because these animals are not fully wild, the filmmakers are not simply observing nature,
00:49they are filming a managed reintroduction process. In episode 2 of Meet the Meerkats,
00:54a meerkat is severely injured. The crew continues filming as the animal suffers. The narrator describes
01:01the meerkat is on death's door, adding that exposed and alone, hours pass. If this were
01:09a purely wild interaction, non-intervention might be defensible, but these are inexperienced,
01:15human-managed animals placed into a dangerous environment. The footage shows prolonged filming
01:21of the injured animal, including multiple angles while it remains exposed and in a serious condition.
01:26This raises serious ethical concerns.
01:33Let's look at the cobra sequence in episode 3. The narration frames the encounter saying,
01:38It's every meerkat's worst nightmare.
01:41Even noting that just months earlier, the encounter is presented as natural,
01:48but the filming suggests otherwise. The sequence includes multiple extremely close shots of the
01:53cobra, including when it's reared up and facing the camera. These angles are consistent with controlled
02:00conditions. But there is also independent evidence. African Reptiles and Venom, a company that wrangles
02:08venomous snakes for the film industry, posted publicly that they were visiting the area and stated that they
02:14were there to do the wrangling of Cape Cobras as they interact with meerkat. They also shared a posed
02:20photograph of a cobra that matches the snake seen in the program. Our analysis of the scale patterns and
02:27markings indicates it is the same individual. Taken together, this suggests that a cobra was intentionally
02:33introduced to the meerkats. Snake wrangling itself is not illegal, but staging an encounter between a
02:39highly venomous snake and semi-tame animals creates a significant risk to both. South Africa's
02:46Animals Protection Act 71 of 1962 makes it an offence to cause unnecessary suffering or distress to animals
02:54for entertainment. Introducing a dangerous snake into such a scenario and presenting that footage as a
03:00natural encounter raises serious concerns under this law. In episode 4 of Meet the Meerkats, a rain frog
03:10is shown emerging from loose soil that already appears disturbed, as if the frog was intentionally
03:16buried. As the meerkat kills the frog, the ground is visibly dry. This is inconsistent with typical rain frog
03:23behaviour as they usually emerge at night or during wet conditions. In addition, the species shown does not
03:29normally occur in the filming location. Taken together, these points suggest the scene was likely constructed.
03:36Staging live predation raises serious ethical concerns and likely breaches animal welfare regulations.
03:46We contacted Plimsoll Productions for feedback on our observations.
03:50They declined to address any specifics. However, they stated, all relevant rules, regulations and guidelines
03:57were complied with, and suitably trained and qualified animal handlers were used whenever necessary.
04:02This is significant. Plimsoll did not dispute any of the concerns we raised, nor did they provide evidence
04:09to counter them. They did, however, confirm that managed or captive animals were used during production.
04:15There is no clear disclosure of this in the credits. While not illegal, this omission is widely
04:21considered misleading and raises further ethical questions. We also reached out to the director,
04:27Virginia Quinn, the field producer, Rian Venter, and the executive producer, Dr Martha Holmes.
04:34None of them responded directly. Plimsoll Productions stated that our inquiries were causing them
04:40unnecessary alarm and stress. Why straightforward questions would provoke alarm if all rules were indeed
04:47followed remains unclear. African reptiles and venom responded to us by claiming that we are wrong about
04:55a few things with regards to the snake. However, they declined to provide any specifics or evidence
05:01to contradict our observations. Notably, they did not deny their involvement in the production.
05:10We do not object in principle to the use of captive or managed animals in filmmaking,
05:16but it must be done ethically to avoid unnecessary stress or harm. Wild animals often face danger and
05:22harm in nature, but documenting a reintroduction is not the same as observing truly wild behaviour.
05:29Based on the available evidence, Plimsoll Productions continued filming a seriously injured, human-reared,
05:36tame animal, created high-risk predator encounters, constructed a live predation event,
05:43and presented these situations as natural behaviour. These are not simply storytelling choices,
05:49they are ethical decisions. Wildlife deserves to be filmed truthfully without causing avoidable harm to
05:56animals, and audiences deserve honesty from the platforms they trust. This investigation is presented
06:05under the principles of fair use, for the purposes of criticism, commentary, and public interest.
Comments