Skip to playerSkip to main content
Privacy coins briefly outperformed the entire market in late-2025. Now that prices have retraced, we explore whether demand for financial privacy actually grew or if it was just narrative-driven momentum.

Read more πŸ“–
Privacy Coins: Are They Really Anonymous? πŸ‘‰ https://www.coingecko.com/learn/what-...


Timestamps:
00:00 Intro
00:38 The Naval Tweet
02:39 Why Zcash Survives While Monero Gets Banned
03:38 CBDC's
05:02 Institutional Problem
05:52 Will Privacy Coins Survive Real Threats
08:25 Outro
_____________________________


#privacycoins #monero #zcash #crypto #cbdc #privacy #bitcoin #regulation #web3 #xmr #coingecko
Transcript
00:00In 2025, privacy coins got hit hard by regulators. Monero alone got delisted from
00:0673 exchanges, while countries like India ordered exchanges to delist privacy coins entirely. But
00:13somehow, they were also one of the best performing sectors in crypto that year. Zcash rallied over
00:19800%. Monero tripled despite getting kicked off most major platforms. So, is the market just
00:27chasing whatever is hot or something deeper going on? Something about what kind of financial system
00:34people actually want? A lot of it traces back to a single tweet. On October 1st, 2025, Naval Ravikant,
00:43founder of AngelList, one of the most followed voices in Silicon Valley, tweeted,
00:48Bitcoin is insurance against fiat. Zcash is insurance against Bitcoin. Zcash jumped 27
00:56percent within hours. And by mid-November, it was touching $740. Now, Naval isn't exactly a neutral
01:05observer here. He invested $715,000 in the company that developed Zcash back in 2015. So, he has a
01:14direct financial stake in this. And critics pointed that out immediately. And if you want to be
01:19technical about it, the insurance framing doesn't really hold up. Insurance hedges against something
01:26by moving in the opposite direction. And Zcash just moves with Bitcoin. But none of that stopped
01:34the rally, which raises the question of why it resonated so strongly in the first place.
01:40One possibility is timing. By October 2025, the surveillance infrastructure around crypto was
01:46building fast. The EU's DAC-8 directive was set to go live in January this year, which would force
01:52exchanges to automatically report your holdings to tax authorities. CBDCs were inactive pilots across
02:00China, India, and Europe, all built with full transaction traceability. The Financial Action Task Force
02:07had pushed 85 countries to pass travel rule legislation requiring exchanges to collect and share customer
02:14info on every transaction. And when you look at what people were actually doing with Zcash, by late
02:202025, about 30% of the supply had moved into shielded addresses, the ones that encrypt everything. And that
02:27was only around 5% two years earlier. So, maybe Naval's tweet didn't create the demand. It just put words
02:36to
02:37what was already happening. What's also interesting is that all those delistings and bans that we mentioned
02:43didn't hit every privacy coin equally. In places like India and South Korea, privacy coins got banned
02:50across the board. But where regulators leave room for discretion, Zcash tends to survive while Monero
02:56gets dropped. ZEC is still trading on major platforms, and the difference comes down to how they're built.
03:05Monero uses mandatory privacy, meaning every single transaction is encrypted, no exceptions. Zcash gives you a
03:13choice. You can use transparent addresses that work like Bitcoin, fully visible on the blockchain,
03:18or you can use shielded addresses that encrypt everything. And privacy advocates have a problem
03:25with this. They argue that if only some people use the private option, those people stand out. But to
03:31regulators and exchanges, that difference matters, and so Zcash gets more room to operate. Now, the irony is
03:38that while regulators are cutting privacy coins off from traditional finance, they're also building the
03:44strongest argument for why people might want them. 137 countries are now exploring or developing central
03:51bank digital currencies. China's digital yuan is live across 30 plus cities. India's e-rupee hit over 10
03:59billion rupees in circulation by March 2025. Europe is targeting a digital euro decision by 2026. And the
04:07pattern is consistent across all of them. Money that can be tracked and controlled in ways physical
04:13cash never could. For example, China's CBDC has programmable features such as spending restrictions
04:20and expiration dates. In one Shenzhen trial, they programmed vouchers to expire and 90% got spent before
04:28the deadline. Now combine that with the automatic reporting that we mentioned earlier. Exchanges reporting
04:35your holdings to tax authorities and the surveillance isn't theoretical anymore. People can actually see
04:42what the future of money looks like. Fully traceable, reportable, and programmable. And for some, that's
04:48exactly what they want. Better fraud prevention, cleaner tax enforcement, more efficient policy. And for others,
04:55it is a reason to look for alternatives. And when they do, privacy coins are what's there. And it's not
05:02just retail users looking for these alternatives. The same privacy problems show up at the institutional
05:07level as well, just for very different reasons. If you're a hedge fund executing a large trade on
05:13a public blockchain, everyone can see your position. Other traders can front run you before you finish
05:18executing. If you're a corporation using blockchain for supply chain or cross-border payments, your competitors
05:24can see your transaction volumes, suppliers, and cash flow patterns. Protocols like Railgun and Secret
05:32Network let you transact on public blockchains while keeping the details private. Using zero-knowledge
05:38proofs to verify a transaction is valid without revealing what it is. Now they aren't mainstream or
05:44widely adopted yet, but even Vitalik Buterin has used Railgun in June last year to move over 2.6 million
05:51dollars.
05:51Now the question is whether privacy coins can actually survive real threats. So we talked about
05:58the delistings and bans, but what if this goes fully global? By 2025, 97 countries had updated their
06:06privacy coin regulations, and that is up from 79 just two years earlier. But you know, it's still a
06:13patchwork. The real threat is a global consensus that privacy coins can't coexist with financial oversight.
06:21Now is that likely? Probably not. Getting every major economy to agree on anything is hard.
06:27Countries have different priorities, political systems, and relationships with crypto. But if it happens,
06:32the infrastructure will probably collapse with no easy way to convert the privacy coins to dollars.
06:39Peer-to-peer platforms saw a 19% jump in activity after the delistings last year. And that's where people
06:46would most likely go. But P2P can't replace the level of scale and ease offered by centralized exchanges.
06:55So even if privacy coins wouldn't die in such a scenario, they would just get pushed so far to the
07:02margins that for most people they would just be impossible to access. Now the second threat is quantum
07:10computing. And the timeline just got a lot shorter. In November last year, Vitalik Buterin warned that
07:17quantum computers could break the cryptography securing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and privacy coins as
07:24early as 2028. He cited prediction markets that put the probability at 20% by 2030. For privacy coins,
07:32the risk is double. A quantum computer could not only break encryption to steal funds, it could also
07:39decrypt years of past transactions, completely undermining the privacy that these coins were
07:46built to protect. Zcash says it has actually been preparing for this for years. Sean Bo, Zcash's lead
07:53engineer, explained that while the project is not quantum resistant yet, most of the protocol work for
07:58quantum resistance is already done. That other channel can be resistant against quantum adversaries
08:05because it could deploy quantum resistant cryptography. Monero is researching quantum resistance
08:11as well, but they are in earlier stages. With privacy coins already gearing up, it's now a question of
08:18whether they can upgrade before quantum computers eventually break current cryptography. So what is
08:26the verdict? Are privacy coins just hype? Are they something more durable? Well 2025 really forced that
08:33question. Regulators pushed harder and yet demand didn't disappear. And that of course doesn't prove
08:38privacy coins are the future. They're still volatile, vulnerable, and dependent on how far regulation and
08:45technology go. But it does suggest that while part of this may have been driven by excitement or price,
08:50it was also possibly a reaction to the direction the financial system is moving. Now whether that
08:58reaction grows, fades, or gets cut off entirely is still an open question. So where do you think privacy
09:04privacy coins will go this year?
Comments

Recommended