00:00Sir, the Transgender Persons Protection of Rights
00:04in the 2026 amendments, I have been held to reject it,
00:10I have been held to withdraw it, and I have been held to say that
00:14this is the Inhuman Bill, which is what we need to get back from time to time.
00:18And Sir, I am saying that this is what I am saying.
00:20Sir, we see the 5,000,000 people in 2011,
00:24in 2011, the census tells us that 5,000,000 people
00:27are transgender, identify them.
00:32Sir, 5,000,000 people, where there is no multi-stakeholder consultation,
00:38where there is no conversation with them,
00:40it is directly in their hands that we are going to get an amendment.
00:45Sir, this is not a party's authority,
00:48where there are two people who meet with their authority,
00:50which will become a party's authority.
00:51These 5,000,000 people, and their families,
00:55and their families are not responsible for their lives.
00:57Sir, I am standing in their hands.
00:59Sir, when the law was in 2019,
01:02when the Supreme Court was in NALSA versus Union of India,
01:05the Supreme Court was saying that
01:06Transgender rights are equal for all,
01:08which is Article 14, Article 15, Article 19, Article 21,
01:13and when the government friendly did that.
01:14We should have differed by the law of no falschuri área.
01:15Now, the settlement that comes happening to the self-identification earlier today,
01:19we talked about manyating countries.
01:21So we used to call all countries,
01:23for instance,
01:23like Denmark, Iceland, Malta, Norway,
01:26Luxembourg, Portugal...
01:27Our country was talking about self-identification.
01:31Today, we are going to take advantage of our rights.
01:33This is completely wrong.
01:36Sandeep Ji was telling us that 34,000 people have identified you with transgender.
01:43There were 5,556 rejects.
01:47We don't know this at all.
01:50Now, the rejections on the medical board,
01:54the right to dignity in Article 21,
01:58that you are holding on to them.
02:01This is not the rejection of the rejection.
02:04The rejection of the redress was not in the case of 2019.
02:08The problem is that,
02:10the budget has been used by 10%.
02:17Most importantly, sir,
02:19there were a lot of churches.
02:21There were a lot of things about the government.
02:23We can't forget this.
02:25The most popular people were there?
02:29And many people who were interested in their attention?
02:33Sir, when we talk about the rights,
02:36we don't have the rights to them.
02:39We have the rights to the rights to the rights.
02:40We have the rights to the rights to the rights.
02:42We have the rights to the rights to the rights to the rights.
02:54When there and or at the rights to the rights,
02:59we don't have the rights to�� which they Ev Status
03:03we will legitimately reject as well.
03:04These rights to the rights to the rights to the rights to K.
03:06And now,
03:11the rights to the rights to the right extent
03:15the rights to the right form.
03:15You
Comments