Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
00:00Welcome to Cafe Bitan Cinelovers, today this video is not related to any film or series review, today this video is related to my reply, actually there is a council which has declared that in that council many actor products
00:30If we talk about Baghi, the independent YouTube movie reviewers, these pop culture enthusiasts, then they have said that these are fake reviewers who are corrupt influencers.
01:00There is an office collection, they try to reduce it, I would definitely say this like this
01:04There is a need to take action against corrupt influencers but I have a question
01:08Is this declaration being made to you people because under its cover these third class beasts
01:17People with a monster dictatorship mentality do not think even for two seconds before destroying the career of any independent reviewer
01:30They give them strikes, harass them legally, try to scare them by sending legal notices, threaten them. I will not take anyone's name, a hint is enough for the wise, they do all this, harass them, send legal notices just because they want to intimidate them.
02:00Under the pretext, let this malpractice continue. It is not being done. I have a question, I don't know, I am just asking. I have the right to ask, isn't it?
02:27We will decide that too, freedom of expression is also there for them as long as you talk to everyone as per their comfort.
02:33The art which is being made for the public, the public cannot say how the film is and if they can say it, then they cannot say it on a public platform
02:42So what action will be taken against people with this kind of mentality or even if no action is taken, will they be condemned?
02:48This is my question on a public platform and the talk that is going on that influencers bring down collections, first of all, I have never heard anything more childish than this, I will give you an example, there is a channel, I will not name it.
03:18Skyforce and this is not my statement but Komal Nahta ji's statement, you all know who Komal Nahta is, film trade analyst, film critic, he said in his podcast that nowadays a lot of corporate bookings are happening which
03:48Because of that the film is in need of critics and corporate bookings might be required for it.
04:18So you think this crappy movie, plus toxic fans, plus puppet critics, can combine to make your movie a hit?
04:29You think that let's assume that I am not talking about myself, the big YouTube reviewers have said that no, we will not review mainstream Bollywood movies, these are some mainstream movies and the movie turns out to be a dud.
04:59Because people trust the creators who are independent more than the puppet critics, but maybe they trust the people who are relatives or who are not in this line of YouTube, friends, what was it like, how was it
05:29People trust us but they don't worship us. If we keep giving negative reviews intentionally or forcefully then we will become relevant. So that is what I am saying that this is my question to this council.
05:47The kind of steps you are taking against corrupt influencers, those brutal people who crush the freedom of expression, those who believe in monster dictatorship, are going on strike just because
05:58That his poor film cannot be called poor, a recent reviewer was struck off by him, friend if you thought that this is the matter I would have removed it, why are strikes being struck on a two year old video, what does it mean
06:28Focus on making this film instead of pointing fingers at the creator. By pointing fingers at the creator you are not doing any good to your film industry and on top of that this freedom of expression and what not, democratic things.
Be the first to comment