00:00The appellant does not accept that bespoke means better. In fact, in his submission it means that
00:09he has been singled out for different, unjustified and inferior treatment. Not only does this bespoke
00:19process not involve the RMB, it also involves Ravec considering the reason why the appellant
00:29is attending a particular event, even though that is plainly irrelevant to the question
00:36of security. This first introductory point is particularly significant because the appellant's
00:45case is not that he should automatically be entitled to the same protection as he was
00:53previously given when he was a working member of the royal family. The appellant's case is
01:02that he should be considered under the terms of reference and subject to the same process
01:09as any other individual being considered for protective security by Ravec unless there is
01:17a cogent reason to the contrary.
Comments