00:00This DNAA does not mean that the court based on the defendant's acquittal is conditional
00:07Today's case, the DNAA and the defendant's acquittal are two different things
00:14Today's DNAA is because the prosecution told the court
00:18They asked for DNAA because they wanted to hand this case to the Procuratorate of Putrajaya
00:23So it's DNAA
00:25This is what I want to emphasize, because many people may have this meaning
00:28Why is it wrong for a person to be acquitted under conditional circumstances and the court to sentence him to DNAA?
00:34This is wrong
00:35In fact, DNAA can only be followed under two conditions
00:42The first is to follow our criminal procedure law, Article 173G
00:47The first is to say that if the charge is groundless, that is, baseless
00:54That is to say, there is a defect in his charge
00:57In this way, the court can use his power to DNAA this case
01:02The second case, DNAA is when the prosecution told the court
01:06We want DNAA for now
01:09Then the court will ask the prosecution
01:12Will you provide this defendant next?
01:14If the prosecution said
01:16We will provide this defendant next
01:19In this way, the court will give DNAA
01:22This is the legal situation
01:24DNAA only has these two
01:26Then for what reason DNAA
01:29In fact, there are many
01:30In fact, more than one
01:32One of them is like today
01:34The prosecution asked for DNAA
01:36Because they want to hand this case to the Procuratorate of Putrajaya
01:41This is one of the possibilities
01:42The second possibility
01:43Sometimes the investigation may not be complete
01:46So they need to ask for DNAA
01:49Or in the absence of the witness of the prosecution
01:54Also DNAA
Comments