Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 9 months ago
MGA SENATORIAL ASPIRANT, HUMARAP SA MABIBIGAT NA TANONG NG ATING MGA PANELIST

'Tatanggap ka ba ng pork barrel?'- Isa 'yan sa ilang mabibigat na tanong ng ating panelists na kailangang sagutin ng mga kumakandidato sa pagka-Senador. Sumalang din ang mga senatorial aspirant sa 'yes or no' round kaugnay ng mga panukala o isyu ng ating bansa.
Panoorin ang video.
Transcript
00:00Our candidates will now go to the four of our panelists from GMA Public Affairs and GMA Integrated News.
00:08Please watch the running of our panel round.
00:13In the panel round, the senatorial aspirants will answer one-by-one the issues related to them by their selected panel member.
00:23Each aspirant will answer within 60 seconds.
00:27If there is time left, the aspirant will ask a follow-up question or a new question from both panel members.
00:36In the last 5 seconds, you will hear this sound.
00:40When the time is up, you will hear a buzzer.
00:46And the microphone will automatically stop talking.
00:51The aspirants will now face the panelists.
00:55And the questions will be asked by one of the main anchors of 24 Horas and GMA Integrated News and GMA Public Affairs, Ms. Vicky Morales.
01:14Award-winning documentarist of GMA Public Affairs and chairperson of the journalism department of UP Diliman College of Mass Communication,
01:24Kara David.
01:31Senior correspondent and one of the faces of the GMA flagship newscast, 24 Horas.
01:39Host of the investigative public service show, Recibo, the passionate action man, Emil Sumangil.
01:46Anchor of the late-night newscast, Saksi, and 24 Horas Weekend.
01:53And one of the pioneer podcasters of GMA News Online, Pia Arcangel.
02:04Our candidates voted for their success in this round.
02:09And the panelists will ask them questions.
02:13Retired Colonel Ariel Quirubin will go first.
02:17Colonel Quirubin, you were imprisoned in Cudeta against former President Cory Aquino in 1989 where civilians were killed.
02:28You were imprisoned because of this and were given amnesty.
02:32You also participated in the Marine standoff in Fort Bonifacio.
02:36You also participated in the Marine standoff in Fort Bonifacio in 2006 against former President Gloria Arroyo.
02:44And you were imprisoned again but were given amnesty.
02:49My question now is, after all of this, do you still think that in elections,
02:57if there is a gap between the military and civilians?
03:01For me, it was a challenge because we did what I call a military exercise.
03:10Where I was challenged that the government's actions should be right,
03:15and I fought against corruption.
03:18We can see that we are risking our lives for our challenge that what we are fighting for is right.
03:26So I was twice jailed, twice given amnesty.
03:28That's really true.
03:30And I was brought to the morgue clinically dead.
03:34Fighting for what I believe was right.
03:37If you ask me if I have anything to regret, I have no regrets.
03:42But I have bitter lessons about this.
03:45And that is what I want to tell you now
03:49because I believe that we need a brave senator
03:52who fights against corruption and stands up for the well-being of the people.
03:59That is Ariel Quirubin.
04:01Colonel Quirubin, the establishment or the government that you were trying to overthrow
04:07is the same government or establishment that you are trying to join now.
04:12Yes, that's probably true.
04:14But the situation then and the situation now are different.
04:17So what we are saying,
04:20that's why we are running now because of what we saw.
04:24I joined the corporate.
04:26I cannot take this sitting down.
04:28I have really to leave my comfort zone to fight for what I believe is still right.
04:33That is to fight corruption.
04:35Nothing has changed.
04:37Corruption is still there.
04:38Corruption is still there.
04:40Corruption is still there.
04:42Corruption is still there.
04:44Corruption is still there.
04:46Corruption is still there.
04:48Corruption is still there.
04:50Corruption is still there.
04:52Corruption is still there.
04:54Corruption is still there.
04:56Corruption is still there.
04:58Corruption is still there.
05:00Corruption is still there.
05:02Corruption is still there.
05:04Corruption is still there.
05:06Corruption is still there.
05:08Corruption is still there.
05:10Corruption is still there.
05:12Corruption is still there.
05:14Corruption is still there.
05:16Corruption is still there.
05:18Corruption is still there.
05:20Corruption is still there.
05:22Corruption is still there.
05:24Corruption is still there.
05:26Corruption is still there.
05:28Corruption is still there.
05:30Corruption is still there.
05:32Corruption is still there.
05:34Corruption is still there.
05:36Corruption is still there.
05:38Is pork barrel a tool
05:40of the government
05:42to do the so called
05:44redistributive function?
05:47Can you be more clear
05:49Commissioner Mendoza?
05:51Will you accept the pork barrel
05:53or would you not if you are a Senator
05:55and if this pork barrel
05:57is healthy
05:59or is has an adverse effect on our country?
06:02Good evening Caral
06:05and good evening to all who are watching.
06:07I will try to clear my answers.
06:08The concept of the pork barrel is what we are looking for in America so that we can have a redistributive
06:15that will be brought to the countryside, to the specific district, the projects that will give priority to the sectoral needs.
06:23If I were to be a senator, I would vote and pass a law to stop the use of this because the current time is different.
06:34We have many issues with corruption. Life is hard. Many are not able to study. Many are losing their jobs.
06:41But this cannot be done immediately.
06:44Because when I get in there, of course, I will get to know each other. I will make friends.
06:49I will get to know the politics of being together.
06:55What I will look at is the tightening of our so-called controls.
06:59When I get elected, we can show that pork barrel funds can be used appropriately.
07:09Commissioner Mendoza, are you not tired of the trust in the government?
07:15Do you still want to join this very corrupt government?
07:19Loving is not tiring. I love the government. I served here for 27 years.
07:25I started as an auditing aide. I saw how the trust of the public was abused.
07:31Because of this, I will once again challenge the bad aspects of the job.
07:36And we will show that we are worthy of trust.
07:40And not everyone will steal inside the government.
07:44Thank you very much, former Commissioner Mendoza and Cara David.
07:49Next, we will ask Carl Llodi de Guzman.
07:53In 2022, in one of your social media posts, you said,
07:57I quote,
07:58I don't want to repeat the bad experience of the support of the people to Cory,
08:03to Marcos, to Gloria, and to Erap.
08:07What you also said, I quote one more time,
08:10The people are no longer there.
08:12They just continue to suffer and suffer.
08:16First of all, they are misogynistic.
08:19This is your statement.
08:21In a certain way, for our viewers to fully understand,
08:26your statement is against feminism, Carl Llodi.
08:30The question is, even though you asked for forgiveness in your post,
08:34are you still condemning that the country is gone after Cory replaced Marcos and Gloria,
08:41and Erap?
08:43I am still condemning because the situation of the workers and the people at the moment
08:49proves that the people are no longer there after the government changed,
08:55especially during the time of Cory Aquino.
08:57During the time of Cory, contractualization happened.
09:01In the past, it was regularization.
09:03But during the time of Cory, many workers became contractual
09:07because he was the one who implemented the Herrera Law.
09:11The same thing happened to the provincial rate.
09:13Why did the wages of the workers in the province become lower than those in Metro Manila?
09:20In the past, the wages of the workers in the province and in Metro Manila were equal.
09:24Now, it is lower.
09:25So, in this situation, the people are no longer there.
09:29They continue to suffer.
09:31The VAT started from him.
09:33The privatization of the sector of services started from him.
09:37This is bad because what happened
09:40is that the sector of services should have become a business
09:43because the sector of services was entrusted to the big capitalists.
09:47So, Mr. Llodi, what do you think of the people power protests in EDSA?
09:54There were two of them.
09:56Is that wrong or right?
09:59People power is right.
10:02The workers benefited a lot from that
10:04because the workers proved that if the people are united,
10:09even the most dictatorial president in our country can be overthrown.
10:14The only problem is that the promises of the leaders of EDSA
10:20that there will be true democracy did not happen.
10:23It did not happen.
10:25It did not reach the factories.
10:27Thank you very much, Mr. Llodi de Guzman and Ms. Emil Sumangil.
10:32For Ms. Danilo Ramos, the next question.
10:36Good evening, Ms. Danil.
10:38Last year, you went to the Commission on Human Rights
10:42and you filed a complaint for what you called state-sponsored rights violations
10:48because of the surveillance and red-tagging against you.
10:52As you mentioned earlier, you said that there were people wearing bonnets who went to your house.
10:57You were labeled as a terrorist and you experienced harassment
11:00from the government intelligence agents that you believed.
11:04And you said that all of this was a result of your practice of anti-terror law.
11:10This is my question for you, Ms. Danil.
11:13Is there really nothing good that can be learned from your anti-terror law?
11:17And if so, in your opinion, how should our government protect itself
11:23if there is no anti-terror law?
11:25It's true.
11:26I am one of the 37 petitioners for the Anti-Terrorism Law of 2020.
11:34Based on my experience, human rights violations continue
11:39because of the Anti-Terrorism Law, Executive Order No. 70,
11:44Creation of NTF-ELCAT.
11:46I and thousands of farmers, farmers and their families
11:52have experienced terrorism and red-tagging.
11:58What we are fighting for is land for the farmers,
12:03strengthening local food production.
12:06This is the origin of the people.
12:09That's why we appealed to the LGUs, CHR, and even the Special Rapporteur, Irene Khan,
12:16to stop this from happening to our farmers
12:21and to stop the terrorist labeling of Filipinos.
12:25Mr. Danil, in 2020, you forced the military, the Southern Luzon Command,
12:32because of an incident that happened in Southern Luzon.
12:36But the military of the Southern Luzon Command said that it was a legitimate operation,
12:41that it was an encounter.
12:43What can you say about that?
12:45A lot of things are happening, but what the military is saying is different.
12:52They released ordinary farmers, children and women,
12:59as NPAs and terrorists.
13:03You know, I know a lot, not just in Southern Luzon.
13:07Sagan 9 Massacre, Guihul 1-6, Negros 14.
13:12I was part of the fact-finding and I saw what happened in different places,
13:18like in Panay.
13:20Thank you, Mr. Danil.
13:25It's time for the Yes or No round.
13:27I will mention the issues and the candidates will answer Yes or No.
13:35The first issue to pass the controversial Anti-Teenage Pregnancy Bill.
13:41Yes or No?
13:58The officials of the government said that they will set up a firing squad
14:03that will be in charge of the trust case.
14:06What is your vote here?
14:08Yes or No?
14:11Yes or No?
14:21The government officials will hold a public hearing.
14:26Yes or No?
14:41Yes or No?
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended