SC issues Detailed Judgement in Reserved Seats Case | Hassan Ayub's Analysis - video Dailymotion

ARY NEWS

#reservedseatscase #reservedseats #supremecourt #electioncommission #pmlngovt #sunniittehadcouncil #pti #khawarghumman #hassanayub #chaudhryghulamhussain   SC issues Detailed Judgement in Reserved Seats Case | Hassan Ayub's Analysis

Transcript

00:00There are two more paragraphs, which I will read out to you, then you can comment on it comprehensively.

00:05In paragraph 37 of the detailed judgment, it is stated that the election commission's order 22 December 2023,

00:12which the Supreme Court passed on 13 January 2024,

00:17the PTI was declared ineligible to obtain its election certificate under Section 2005, bracket 5 of the Election Act.

00:26As a result of this decision, the other legal and constitutional rights of the PTI were not affected.

00:33In fact, it was observed that if the court had clarified the constitutional position of its order on 13 January 2024,

00:40or the election commission had clarified its order on 22 December 2023 or its order on 13 January 2024,

00:47then there would have been no confusion about the status of the PTI candidates and the specific seats.

00:52As the election commission asked for clarification regarding the implementation of paragraph 10 of our brief decision on 12 July 2024,

01:00there was no legal need in this regard, nor did we find it necessary to ask for clarification of our own order before the two parties,

01:08regarding the points on which the election commission was not clear.

01:12Therefore, we issued a notice to the two parties on the request of the commission without or without hearing the mentioned clarification.

01:19Hassan, this was Justice Shahid Qusmani's opinion.

01:22You have read the entire paragraph of the judgment.

01:26Now, tell us the solution.

01:28This is the opinion of the government.

01:30There is disagreement on this.

01:31This is the opinion of the government.

01:32This is the opinion of various legal experts.

01:34This is your opinion.

01:35The choice is yours.

01:36What is the solution?

01:37The Justice is saying that eventually you will have to go to the Supreme Court.

01:44There is no other option other than this.

01:46You can't hang in between.

01:49Hassan.

01:50No, this judgment can't be instructed.

01:53But you have to see how the implementation of the judgment can be done.

02:00Justice Shahid Qusmani, I believe he was not aware that the appeals of Article 185 have been dismissed

02:08and the impugned order has been satisfied.

02:10I guess he was not aware of this.

02:13You can see that the questions raised by Justice Aminuddin Khan and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan

02:20on the brief decision in their detailed reasons,

02:25those are not questions, those are charge sheets.

02:27Mr. Khawar Ghooman, look at Article 51 of the Act, Article 106 of the Act and Article 63 of the Act.

02:35In their presence, without suspending them, this detailed decision of the Supreme Court,

02:40which has been written by Justice Mansoor Shah, has been given detailed reasoning.

02:44Implementation cannot be done on this.

02:46When implementation cannot be done on this, then what is the reason for this?

02:50There are only two things.

02:51Either implementation has to be done on this or not.

02:52So, to implement on this, you need a judgment.

02:55You suspend these articles or remove them.

02:59Put a good article instead of them in the eyes of Pakistan.

03:01Or you can review and recall this judgment by the Supreme Court itself.

03:06Because right now, the matter is such that it will get entangled in between.

03:09There will be no implementation on this.

03:11It is not possible because there will be a violation of the law.

03:13Now, look, there can be a violation of the law.

03:16That is, if for a moment, the Supreme Court says,

03:21that the Election Commission, while violating the law,

03:24which was a uniform symbol, but could not negate party affiliation,

03:29that is a violation of the law.

03:31This judgment, which the judges have written,

03:34this is a violation of the Pakistani Constitution.

03:36This is a violation of the Pakistani Constitution.

03:38If this judgment is not implemented, then there will be a violation of the law.

03:43Because this Article 63, because people have given their signatures before.

03:47Article 51, its violation.

03:50Then Article 106, that is, where will you take these three articles?

03:54And even in this, Article 185, which was the appeal diary,

03:58you did not hear it either.

04:00It has also been dismissed.

04:01That is, four articles of the Constitution of Pakistan are invoked in this.

04:06And you are relying on Article 17.

04:09This will not be possible.

04:10These things are mandatory.

04:12And there can be no implementation on this.

04:14Save your honor.

04:15Put your own review.

04:16Recall this judgment.

04:18And then there are two groups of infidels.

04:22You have no option.

04:23Hassan, your opinion.

04:24Viewers, respecting Hassan's opinion,

04:27I feel that for the next half hour,

04:30the 11 judges of the Supreme Court,

04:33who have given this decision,

04:358 majority, and the other 3 judges,

04:37who have accepted the legal status of Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaad,

04:41and at least half the members have also given,

04:43they will either have to do LLB again,

04:47they will have to explain the law again,

04:49or they will have to explain the constitution.

04:51Because all these things that Hassan Ayub has given,

04:56Article 51, Article 106, and all the references,

05:00one by one, A to Z,

05:03everyone has been responded to in this detailed judgment.

SC issues Detailed Judgement in Reserved Seats Case | Hassan Ayub's Analysis

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended