National Assembly aur Punjab Assembly kay Speaker kay Letter ki Qanooni Haisiyat Kiya Hai?

#nationalassembly #punjabassembly #constitutionalamendment #malikahmedkhan #ayazsadiq

National Assembly aur Punjab Assembly kay Speaker kay Letter ki Qanooni Haisiyat Kiya Hai?

Transcript

00:00Jahangir Jadoon, Ayaz Sadiq saab is saying that the legislation that we have implemented will be in retrospect from 2017 onwards.

00:08And according to this, the Supreme Court's decision cannot be more than this.

00:15It is beyond the scope of legislation.

00:18Now, do you agree with this because Ali Muhammad Khan saab was present there.

00:22He was saying that it cannot be done in retrospect.

00:24No, see there are two reasons for this.

00:27One is that the Supreme Court's judgment has been given a short order,

00:31an explanation has been given and a detailed judgment has to be given.

00:34Now, what is the reasoning behind the detailed judgment?

00:36Basically, there was an interpretation of a constitutional point and an election act.

00:41So, if the Supreme Court interprets a constitutional provision or a detailed judgment is given,

00:47then if the Parliament wants to make an amendment, then it can only be done through a constitutional amendment.

00:54This is a way of pressurizing people to write letters.

00:59When Yusuf Ghilani was sentenced for contempt of court,

01:04the Speaker wrote a letter at that time.

01:07A letter can do nothing.

01:08The Speaker does not have judicial power.

01:10The Speaker should investigate the incident that took place in the Assembly that day,

01:15where he has the power.

01:17He should file an FIR against the people who came from the FIA or the police.

01:21So, you are saying it is a waste of time.

01:23It is a waste of time.

01:24It means that it should not be done.

01:26It should not be done or it cannot be done?

01:28No, it can be done.

01:30It is not a judicial forum.

01:32But they are using the law to tell the ECP to implement the law.

01:36The ECP is a constitutional institution.

01:40It knows that the people there are very competent.

01:43If they themselves do not want to implement the judgment for some reason, then it is up to them.

01:47Otherwise, the Supreme Court's judgment, whether to agree or disagree with it,

01:50it is the judgment of the Supreme Court.

01:52And it is your law to implement it.

01:54You have to implement it.

01:56It is not a matter of insult.

01:58I will take the same question to Mr. Pasha.

02:00Mr. Hassan Raza Pasha, is this law,

02:03the amendment that the Election Act amended in 2024,

02:07is it valid?

02:09Is the Supreme Court's decision valid?

02:11The letter that the Speaker wrote for implementation,

02:14what is its legal status?

02:17Look, the formula of the Tri-Economy of Power in the eyes of Pakistan,

02:22the parliament, the judiciary and the administration have put their domain in it.

02:31Now, there is no doubt that they have done the right of the parliament to legislate.

02:38And the agreed parties have also challenged,

02:42which has not been heard yet.

02:44It has not been heard yet.

02:46Let's see how the Supreme Court of Pakistan sees it.

02:50But the third important thing to see is whether the Speaker

02:56can implement this law in this way.

03:04So my answer is also negative.

03:06If the parliament wants to legislate,

03:11then the courts have to explain it.

03:13And then the administration has to implement it.

03:16Look, where the matter will go,

03:19whether it will go to the administration for implementation,

03:22or it will go to some other regulatory body for implementation,

03:26then they have to deal with the lawyers,

03:30or deal with that law.

03:33And then we have to see our right,

03:35whether the law and the constitution has given us the right

03:39to implement it or not.

03:43There is no other opinion in this.

03:45So you are also saying that the Speaker should not have written the letter.

03:49The ACP should have decided it himself.

03:51So tell me this, Mr. Abbas.

03:53Counter question.

03:56The Speaker has to write the matters of the National Assembly.

04:00And because the Speaker has to deal with the matters of the National Assembly,

04:02then there is a gap in the National Assembly,

04:04because of which the proceedings of the National Assembly have been halted.

04:07And the proceedings are that they have to amend the constitution,

04:09but the numbers are not complete.

04:11If the implementation of this law is done,

04:14then the numbers will be completed.

04:15And if the numbers are completed,

04:16then the proceedings of the National Assembly will move forward.

04:18Now this is a hurdle.

04:21To remove this hurdle,

04:23in the proceedings of the National Assembly,

04:25shouldn't the Speaker of the National Assembly write a letter?

04:29No, I don't think so.

04:31He should call a hearing.

04:33He should legislate on it.

04:35He can present a resolution.

04:37He can do anything.

04:38Look, one solution to this,

04:40I have been saying from day one that

04:42the only solution to this is with the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

04:46We will have to look at them a little too.

04:48Why are they not announcing a detailed judgment?

04:51And secondly, after announcing a detailed judgment,

04:55the review petitions that have come,

04:57should be put up for hearing.

04:59And give an exhaustive kind of judgment.

05:02At least remove this confusion.

05:06If they don't do it and delay it,

05:08then this kind of situation will continue to develop.

05:12Sometimes the Speaker will write a letter.

05:13Sometimes the administration will say something.

05:15Sometimes the election commission of Pakistan will say something.

05:17So I think the Supreme Court of Pakistan should move forward.

05:23So the decision is a detailed judgment.

05:26Detailed judgment.

05:27It should be given.

05:28It should not be ignored.

05:29Mr. Jadun, now the question arises,

05:31what options does the ECP have?

05:34The ECP has one option,

05:35that the decision of the Supreme Court,

05:37whatever it is,

05:38should be implemented.

05:39According to that, it should be noticed.

05:41They haven't done that yet.

05:42It has been delayed.

05:43Secondly, the law that the Parliament has passed,

05:48has brought an amendment,

05:49has brought a retrospective,

05:51that is, there will be a divorce in the past as well,

05:53from 2017.

05:54By implementing that,

05:55the number game should be changed.

05:57And all of them should not be included in the PTI.

06:00SIC should remain SIC,

06:01PTI should not be made.

06:02In your opinion,

06:03for the ECP,

06:05legally,

06:06with the law,

06:07and with legality,

06:08what will be more aligned?

06:10Look, in this,

06:12the ECP has given a judgment to the Supreme Court.

06:14It was a full court.

06:1513 members were present in that bench.

06:18Two disagreed.

06:1911 Judgment Chiefs.

06:21They themselves are saying that

06:23PTI has fought an election as a party,

06:25and these seats are theirs.

06:26So why is the ECP interpreting itself in this?

06:29I don't understand.

06:30That should be implemented straight away.

06:32But the ECP,

06:33is not working as a constitutional institution.

06:36The ECP is biased.

06:38That is the reason.

06:39The government says the same about some other institution.

06:41It is biased.

06:42No, the government,

06:43whether it says it or not,

06:45it is biased because,

06:47if you want to delay a party,

06:52if it wants to,

06:54foreign funding case delays for 7 years.

06:56If it wants to,

06:57it works in minutes.

06:58Use your discretion,

07:00as per law.

07:02The Supreme Court has asked for an explanation.

07:05They have explained.

07:06They said,

07:07these 41 people,

07:08from whom they have given declarations,

07:10notify PTI.

07:11Now they are sitting on it again.

07:13A detailed judgment has come.

07:14This means,

07:15the ECP is not doing it on its own.

07:17There is a force behind it.

07:19Why are you undermining the ECP so much?

07:21Why is there a force behind it?

07:23Why can't it do it on its own?

07:25The ECP is the trustee of the people.

07:27The ECP is an institution in the whole of Pakistan,

07:29which is an institution,

07:30whose job is to hold elections.

07:32The ECP is the worst.

07:34Sometimes RTS sits in 2018.

07:36Sometimes,

07:37all the petitions that come,

07:39today,

07:40the litigation in the Supreme Court,

07:42the delay is the ECP's case.

National Assembly aur Punjab Assembly kay Speaker kay Letter ki Qanooni Haisiyat Kiya Hai?

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended