00:00For your refusal to answer, what are you invoking?
00:04I have pending cases in court.
00:09My understanding is that everything I'm saying here is incriminating my own self.
00:15Okay, this one. How can this be incriminating? What particular case?
00:19It has to have a particularity. It doesn't have to be pending.
00:23I have a pending citizenship issue in court.
00:30I think there are seven pending cases in court right now.
00:35Citizenship is one of them.
00:37For example, you have a case in Estapa. It's not connected to Estapa.
00:41You can't say you have a case in court.
00:43You have to specify where you can incriminate.
00:46Your answer can be used to prove your guilt in a criminal case. Which one?
00:51Sen, I'm sorry. I said it wrong earlier. It's not citizenship. It should be a criminal case.
01:00A pending case has already been filed for a criminal case.
01:06Material misrepresentation case. Maybe it's a criminal case.
01:10Yes, it's a criminal case.
01:12Why is this related?
01:16That's all I know. There are pending cases in the criminal case.
01:22But actually, Madam Chair, this appears to be a document issued by the People's Republic of China.
01:28I'm requesting for the ACR.
01:32Our Philippine form.
01:35Philippine form accomplished by a child.
01:37Supposed to be, but a child with consciousness already.
01:40Who happens to be the younger Alice Bo. That's your theory.
01:44But I want to show it to her.
01:47Can we flash that ACR again and show it to Alice Bo?
01:54Madam Chair, Madam Chair.
01:56Yes, Sen Rafi, unrelated questions.
01:59Yes, on August 27, 2020 for hearing, page 141 of the transcript,
02:05Sheila Bo admitted that Alice Bo has two passports.
02:12Yes, so that means she's a dual citizen.
02:15Chinese and Filipino.
02:17All right. Thank you, Sen Rafi, for reminding me.
02:20So you're really a dual citizen, even though Ms. Sheila Bo reminded you, Sen Rafi.
02:27And in fact, you know that dual citizenship is not allowed in China.
02:31Only here in the Philippines, there is such a thing.
02:35But in China, that's prohibited.
02:37And yet you have both Filipino and Chinese passports.
02:41In Sheila Bo's testimony.
02:44Madam Chair, I have only one Filipino passport.
02:49Yes, you have only one Filipino passport.
02:52But you have a Chinese passport.
02:54I don't have a Chinese passport.
02:56Okay.
02:57Can we show the ACR we're asking for?
03:00Before we act on the, we finalize the motion of the chair seconded by Sen Joel.
03:08Okay.
03:09Is that the biggest one?
03:11All right.
03:12So this is the ACR form.
03:15That's not a kid anymore, right?
03:19There's consciousness in that picture.
03:22That's the question we asked Alice.
03:24Alice, do you remember that you accomplished that form?
03:30That you even put a fingerprint voluntarily?
03:34Do you remember or not?
03:36Sen, I don't remember doing such a document.
03:40Okay.
03:41I'm in a trebulous mood.
03:43Putting a fingerprint there is like putting a fingerprint on other documents.
03:47That's it Madam Chair.
03:49That all convinces me of the lying.
03:51I think you're done.
03:55You already declared it incontemporary.
03:57I'm just elaborating.
04:00You already declared it.
04:04This is still lying.
04:05Not only refusal to answer the death threat.
04:07So, sorry Alice.
04:11I gave you a chance.
04:13You mean to say, even putting your fingerprint there, you don't remember?
04:19So, it's a bit, what is it?
04:23It's a bit, what is it?
04:26Laird.
04:27It's too difficult to, it's too hard to believe.
04:32How did you do it?
04:33Did you get your fingerprints?
04:35Did you force it?
04:36I mean, it's too much.
04:38But, it's no longer in the picture.
04:42So, with that Mr. Chair, it puts to rest your contempt citation of the resource person.
04:51Thank you Madam Chair.
04:52Thank you Madam Chair.
04:53Thank you Madam Chair, if I may.
04:55Thank you, Mr. Pro Tempore.
04:58How old were you when you got your thumbprint?
05:06I don't remember getting my thumbprint.
05:11Was it a thumbprint?
05:16You don't remember getting your thumbprint?
05:19How old were you when you got your thumbprint?
05:29You do not know how old were you?
05:32I don't remember getting my thumbprint on that paper.
05:38Do you have a signature on that?
05:40Yes, I do.
05:41Did you sign it?
05:42Did you sign it?
05:43You don't remember getting your thumbprint?
05:47Huh?
05:48I don't remember getting my thumbprint.
05:49Did you sign it?
05:50Did you sign it?
05:52Let's see the ACR again.
05:54Did you sign it?
06:00Yes, let's see the ACR form that has a photo, fingerprints, and signature.
06:06Oh yeah, there's a signature. Is that your signature?
06:09Yes.
06:10Yes.
06:15So, what we're showing here is Alice's fingerprints.
06:19But when the FBI compared it to your fingerprints, it's an identical match.
06:28Madam Chair, the letter answer, is that your signature, Alice?
06:33Under the picture, it's my signature, but I don't know how that happened.
06:41How do you not know how it happened?
06:43I really don't know, Sen.
06:45You don't know? Did you sign it? Did you sign it?
06:48No, I didn't sign that document, but it's my signature.
06:53But I haven't confirmed that it's my signature.
06:57You haven't confirmed that it's your signature.
07:00I'm just confirming, Madam Chair.
07:02The signature under the picture is my signature.
07:06But you didn't remember when you signed that?
07:09I haven't done that yet.
07:14It is impossible to fake fingerprints.
07:18You confirmed that you signed it.
07:21The fingerprints here and the fingerprints in the document are a match of the FBI.
07:30It's just one person.
Comments