FEMISODE 07 New Words Needed

PlanetteEarthMother'sWoombyWoomby films

This is:  WORLDWIDE SOLUTIONS  PLANETTE EARTH MOTHER  IDEAS FOR A NEW WORLD  (Full Series Playlist Link Just Below)   This new series is based on my essay that a sexist at Facebook blocked. I will be publishing the scripts in essay form as I release each Femisode of the series.   Many, many more links to my full body of work including music, film, writing are at the bottom of this description.   PLANETTE EARTH MOTHER Series: Femisodes Scripts: http://jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com/2024/06/worldwide-solutions-planette-earth.html?m=1   Full Playlist For This Series: https://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x8fhs0   Original essay: http://jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com/2024/04/superspecielle-feminism.html?m=1   All my feature length documentaries that cover common land and footpath rights issues in West Norfolk and many other very serious concerns in this region and our nation, are available on this channel in 30min episodes ... check out my full links list below for shortcuts to the documentary films   My three latest projects are also on DAILYMOTION now. I have just completed a documentary series about the sugar beet industry, and my new pre-series called Talking And Walking has started on DAILYMOTION: it is the prologue to this series.   It is time to Feminise Reality :)   ... Merci Les Bien, Thank You Very Much Everyone    LINKS:   Official Governmental Petition For Equal Representation For Women In Every Political Constituency   https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/659743/sponsors/new?token=at-a-DZ9X2gpr2pYhzMZ   Dailymotion: 30min Versions Of "Footpaths In Crisis" Documentaries:  Channel: https://www.dailymotion.com/uk_footpaths_in_crisis  Playlist: https://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x83hta   (PLEASE CHECK OUT THE SANDRINGHAM DOCUMENTARIES HERE ON DAILYMOTION, AND THERE IS ALSO VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION IN ALL THE OTHER FILMS ALSO INCLUDED HERE ON DAILYMOTION ; Merci, thankyou )   Dailymotion: Sugarbeet Problems:  Playlist: https://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x8a7ja   Dailymotion: Talking And Walking:  Playlist: https://dailymotion.com/playlist/x8b12w   Dailymotion: West Norfolk Shorts:  Playlist: https://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x87iaw   Main Blog:  https://jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com   Metaphysical Theory Of Infinity:  http://jasonwadehowardadditional.blogspot.com/2013/03/infinitys-evolving-strata-and-life.html?m=1   THE.CACOPHONIC.QUADRANT. Music Channel:  https://www.youtube.com/@the.cacophonic.quadrant.   Search Me Blog:  https://jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html?m=1   YouTube: Full Length Versions Of "Footpaths In Crisis" Documentaries:  https://www.youtube.com/@UKFootpathsInCrisis  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5QNfRoQzoKaz6Np0_sFIA0KBtwQ3dae6   CONTACT:  Facebook:   Jason HowardLove: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100090638659423   Twitter:  Jason HowardLove: https://twitter.com/JasonHowardLove   Email Contact:  jason_howard@hotmail.co.uk   #Leziate #Love #Feminism #Equality  #HilGay

Transcript

00:00In this series I am discussing the essential need for this planet and all her peoples to

00:25feminise our viewpoints and behaviours.

00:30World Wide Solutions, Planet Earth Mother, Ideas for a New World.

00:35Please see my previous documentaries as a valuable introduction to this series.

00:39Sugar Beet Problems Conclusion Episodes 4 and 5 and my Talking and Walking mini-series

00:44of three episodes are important viewing and essential to contextualise this project.

00:49I will be publishing the minutes script from each episode of the series onto my blog page

00:54jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com as I release each episode.

00:59My original blog post for the first version of this essay was blocked by someone at Facebook

01:03who invoked the spam application to get my blog URL marked as an unshareable on Facebook

01:08link.

01:09This redraft includes the info from the first essay but it largely expands its coverage.

01:24Superspecialism The world's different species and their being

01:44in minorities that are not reflections of prehistory, ecosystem or population ratios

01:50can be seen as an artificial population distribution due to the activities of our species and the

01:55fact we like to separate our activities philosophically from nature and other species.

02:01We are apparently artificial, man-made, better, different, but we and everything we do can

02:07be considered as natural processes of energy matter systems trying to build towards total

02:13love inclusion.

02:14Extensionising of cognitive complexificationalises of cuddly whatsitses

02:20One could say that prehistorical ecosystem or population ratios were also artificial

02:26because the yardstick is not our species and our specialness, but the fact love was not

02:30the system of social interspecial approach.

02:33Any actions that do not include love and inclusivity and emcherishment of diversity of all species

02:39as equals can be considered as being an artificial and non-perfectional state of being.

02:45We must exist within a multiversal, cacophonic song of diversity joy.

02:52This is a macrocosm of what we seek to do with language, whilst we must beautify and

02:56perfectionalise and lovety-focus our lingual inter-exchanges, diversity of language with

03:02acceptance of colloquialisms and dialects with the pronunciation of different regions

03:07being included as correct and with different tense forms of words being accepted and encouraged

03:12with infinite lovey-dovey, kissy-blissy, num-num yumptiousnesses.

03:17Dictionary Review

03:19As I mentioned in the last Femisode, I would like to take a look at a few possible ideas

03:23for perfectionalising the English language. As I said before, I do not see it as my role

03:27to do this work, but I just want to show a few examples of the possible things that I

03:31feel women would probably like to look at upon their full review and reformulation of

03:36the English language. A feministic review I see as an essential move forwards for English

03:41speaking culture. All languages worldwide require the same attention as there is a lot

03:47of problematic language usage going on. I am not here to do the work itself, but I would

03:52wish to inspire girls to realise that a new lingual future is theirs for creating. All

03:58languages dictionaries reviews ascertaining whether a language can be kept or banning

04:03of certain words from common speech, borrowing certain words that we are sure of the purity

04:07of their conception. Women are desperately needed to perfectionise language worldwide

04:13to save man from himself.

04:16Oilseed Rape

04:17You go to the shop and you buy vegetable oil. You look on the back of it and you see that

04:22it is from a plant called oilseed rape. So in man's benevolence he deems to lessen the

04:27blow of this moniker by not just calling the plant rape, but to call it oilseed rape, like

04:33that is enough to placate the emotional trauma and post-traumatic stress of rape victims.

04:39Men take from this plant a product called rapeseed oil. Men are refusing to change this

04:44word which shows you the mentality of men who make decisions upon word usage within

04:49the English language. All the intelligentsia, this is also an offensive term, at all the

04:55important in inverted commas universities as part of their hierarchical monopoly of

05:00funding etc. You've got your Oxford first and Cambridge second first dictionary people

05:06who like to formulate how the English language must work. They need to seriously examine

05:11what they are doing. They need to let girls in the door and they all need to walk out

05:15and let girls get rid of all the horrible stuff.

05:19Rape

05:20Oilseed rape is on the list. Imagine if you are a woman who has been a victim of rape.

05:27Men rape a lot of women, it goes on all the time. There's lots of victims of rape and

05:31the word rape, oilseed rape, how can you call a plant oilseed rape? Why do men not call

05:39it rape oil? Why don't they put that term on the front of the packaging? Like putting

05:44it on the back helps. It is plant oil, it is not vegetable oil, not rape oil. If the

05:52men who formulate dictionaries do not change this word they must be arrested for psychological

05:57bullying. I wonder how many feminist groups have been lobbying dictionary aficionados

06:02over the centuries. Sorry feminists are used to being burnt at the stake. Sorry feminists

06:07used to being burnt at the stake. Sorry I mean feminists used to be burnt at the stake.

06:15But of course feminists still lobby dictionary aficionados and get ignored on this very subject

06:21one would imagine. So the usage of rape victims to label vegetable oil seems to be a term

06:27that has to go. I can't go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on

06:33and on and on about this enough. It needs to go now. Putting the rape reference reminder

06:40on the back of the carcinogenic plastic bottle seems wholly inadequate. I had to cover my

06:45arse on this one. A rape reference that all men use in common speech. The word bugger

06:51is a rape word but men use this word in common speech. Men negativise or even positivise

06:59anything for bullying. Women think that the feelings that words evoke are important. Men

07:06seem to want to hold onto traditions from rape and pillage times. Women feel that the

07:12etymologies of words are important too and even maybe sometimes coincidental phonics

07:17that sound not nice are relevant to qualify a word for the archaic, offensive, consignment

07:22to the trash bin of oblivion section. I look forward to the day when all girls worldwide

07:27get rid of any words that make girls feel bad. Manish kind. Not so kind but similar

07:35to each other. Though women who are kind aren't allowed to be called womankind or even the

07:39official sounding woman. I really don't think they want to be called any derivation of man

07:45to be honest. So womankind are also mankind but now man deigns to call us all humankind

07:53though not all humans are kind as a token gesture. I think we should all call ourselves

07:59womankind for 3000 years to make up the difference. That's how you persuade girls that you love

08:05girls by being unreservedly prepared to allow them to change any words in all languages

08:10worldwide perhaps. Let's allow women to take all words with the man morpheme and change

08:18them all to the woman morpheme. But alas there is no morpheme of the definitional conceptualisational

08:26woman. I am not sure the girls would actually want to do this based upon the idea that man

08:32has raped defiled women since the dawn of time to the point that they really do not

08:37want the man morpheme to even exist anymore. Certainly not be a word construction factor

08:42in relation to girls and their new gorgeous language gorgeousnesses. The womanifesto of

08:49the dictionary review though is of course for girls to make all these decisions on their

08:54own so I will ignore what I just said and carry on with what I was going to say. Changing

08:59all words that start with the prefix man to not human like in humanifacturing but to woman

09:05as in womanifacturing evidence is the type of womentality that man needs to prove. Women

09:12deserve for men to actually mean what they say when they get down on one knee. What about

09:18womanifest? Womanifesting your own destiny. Men stopping being in the way of women womanifesting

09:26their own destinies. To womanifest our destiny our collective destiny of all women children

09:34and men of all genders of all species. Let's love this as were mandatory that we are going

09:41to do that then we can prove to women that we love them. If we do not get the men in

09:46charge of languages to step aside then women will continue to think that we don't which

09:52is clearly apparent in the way that women treat men. When you've got modern culture

09:57continually trying to drive women into prostitution get them modelling get them stripping get

10:02them lap dancing get them prostituting themselves out. Men go to lap dancing clubs on stag

10:08dos how disgusting is that and women are expected to put up with this and men are expected to

10:13join in with this. Women do not want any of this culture normative to continue women just

10:18want fidelity they want monogamy they want hugs and love and kisses they want human contact

10:23they want you to brush their hair they want you to wash them they want you to cuddle them.

10:28If you actually do everything right they might actually let you cuddle them. Modern

10:32culture clearly shows that women have a disdain for men which men then seek to use to flavourise

10:38all culture against women to present women's behaviour as being at fault like men have

10:43the right to criticise the way women struggle whilst being held down by their societal rapist.

10:49So the wo in woman is an add-on not a root. Women have always been treated as an accessory

10:57not a central focus for love. Women have always been treated as an accessory not a

11:01central focus of love. Men struggle with the notion that women want to be loved or even

11:07have their own words. Men struggle with the notion that women would not want to be loved

11:13or even not have their own words. English language withstanding. And the term men itself

11:21is from the word constituent part or morpheme man which means hand as in manual which

11:27was installed as a term to refer to a person during feudal system times. A man was a hand

11:33a serf a slave which is what a land owner slave owner would call you. He's just a hand

11:40just a man to serve your lord and master and woman being an add-on term probably meaning

11:46you are less in importance just a wo-man something to slow a man's work maybe a drain on resources

11:53in the eyes of some land owners just a wife but useful for breeding one would imagine

11:57if one wanted more slaves maybe. Why the term for girl of feudal times would be added to

12:03the term for man defies understanding unless it was a measure to defeminize or reduce the

12:08sociological importance of women. Feudal barons prerogatives and such insistences upon terminology

12:14etc maybe. A woman being another slave maybe an object for use not in cherishment perhaps.

12:22The word hate should be illegal in certain applications like I hate you and don't you

12:27just hate her shitty little kids and I love to hate etc. I really do think that all disturbing

12:33tattoos have to not only be made illegal but must be legally removed. Graphic images of

12:39skulls etc are disgusting and written tattoos like love hate knuckle tattoos are a disgrace

12:46to womanity. To be honest I think we could probably justify the removal of the word hate

12:52from the dictionary completely maybe. The term queer is highly offensive and should

12:58only be utilised when referring to its offensiveness and never used as a label. It is as offensive

13:04as saying someone is straight or bent or calling someone a nigger and other disgustingly etymologicalised

13:10terms. Being one whom is labelled doesn't exclude one from decency laws. Using terms

13:16that are highly offensive and breach anti-homophobic laws and anti-racism laws can never be acceptable

13:22as it simply sanitises and creates a subconscious to conscious acceptance of not only the specific

13:28terms but any such offensively etymologicalised terms per se. The intention of these words

13:34and the way they were developed was solely for the intention of causing offence and to

13:38apply a negative label to a subsection of society that men wanted to feel vulnerable.

13:44These historical terms of bullying can never be re-accepted into common speech. I understand

13:49why African peoples or homosexual people would seek to own these terms for themselves

13:54but what they need to understand is that they have no right to do so. They are being highly

13:59offensive to others and themselves and it causes continued socio-psychological conflictions

14:04and trauma. People have been traumatised by these bullying terms and I am very much aware

14:10that this subject is extremely upsetting for a lot of people, not only by those whom have

14:14been labelled but also the modern, kind and considerate majority of lovely compassionate

14:19people. I understand people have sought to embrace these terms for multiple reasons and

14:24I do not wish to upset people further but I know that if we do not move our language

14:28away from negative labelling acceptance we will continue to suffer under the exclusionary

14:33and prejudicial inheritance that man has championed for generations. We need to move on.

14:39The word human backdated to try and sanitise what man did to the world and women and girls

14:45and boys and other species. Man, whom still runs the world, has no right to expect that

14:51he can backdate this term in this way. Man was the controller and murderer and rapist

14:56of the past. Now we can refer to ourselves as humans apparently but I personally foresee

15:02that women would want a new term that does not include the word morpheme man. I think

15:06a new feminised, as in a completely feminine term, would be appropriate. We are XY and

15:13all from feminine evolutionary origins so why not? The X goes in front because I am

15:19a gentleman. Getting rid of the word work. Everybody should be able to do what they wish

15:25with their time and enjoy a comfortable existence. Men have historically had to work by means

15:31of being forced to by feudal system landowners, gentry and aristocracy. And this slavery inheritance

15:38has continued to be the system of torture of choice. This system is backed by a rich

15:43man's financial system that installs an economic landscape of enforced desperation where people

15:49are literally forced by fear of death upon themselves and their family if they do not

15:53toe the line. Men have indoctrinated themselves into buying into this concept and will bully

15:59and destroy anyone who does not conform unless they are rich. But a new world of financial

16:05systems abolition and new girly laws for compassionistic protection of everyone and automation of all

16:11laboursome roles in the world and a new global food growing lovely superstructure will provide

16:17all species with all the free time they wish to fulfil their dreams. When we do away with

16:22the word work and the theory of such, what remains other than fun? Art fun, dancey fun,

16:29music fun, sport fun, building fun, designing fun, communicationalistic lovey cuddle fun,

16:36fun fun. Lots and lots of fun. Everything we do must always be fun for everyone. I will

16:43say more on this later as it pertains to work theory. Capital punishment is really enough

16:49to do away with the word capital. Taking life is never justified when there is no defensive

16:54prerogative. Capital cities are virtual installations of capital punishment upon a nation or state

17:02as the way men run their political monopolies causes widespread fear and control through

17:07non-social monetary support and enforced slavery. A system of masculine political control that

17:14will put you on the streets if you do not do what your forefathers did in accepting

17:18a world that impoverishes you so you can't follow your dreams. I do not want my children

17:24to do anything other than exactly what they wish to do. A new world cherishes people doing

17:29what they want to do to fulfil their hopes and dreams.

17:34The word animal. The word animal is now unusable. It has been used to frame abuse. Not only

17:40has man abused all other species but he has also included the word within an abusive vocabulary.

17:46You are just an animal. We are all animals. The common lexicon needs to change. Saying

17:52that they are animals, this is separationist. It is lingual segregationism, mimetically

17:58ghettoistic. Like the use of the word evolution for every application possible is not appropriate.

18:05Evolution is a very torturous process by which people are traumatised and die over countless

18:09generations so the term must be reserved for this serious usage only in my opinion and

18:15its widespread usage must be rolled back to only the most ethical of uses. It is used

18:19for everything in a throwaway ilk and this is highly inappropriate and disrespectful

18:24to the lost lives of countless people. We need a new accepted phrase or word for this

18:30meaning. We have to be perfectly pedantical in our need to be compassionate in the construction

18:36of sentences we use to free others. We can't perpetuate the status quo. We need a new system

18:42of nomenclature for the future. We are all animals. Separative syntax and vocabulary

18:49just perpetuates the objectification of people of other species. This creates a compartmentalising

18:54disconnect that fosters continuations of rape torture and murder. If we change our words

19:00and minds we change the world. So here are some more words and their usages that I think

19:06will be removed from language upon a full feminine review of the English dictionary.

19:12Word Bans

19:13In quickfire succession, quickfire refers to shooting a gun fast so that compound word

19:18form is out. And the word fire reminds loved ones of their people who have died in house

19:24fires, burnt badly people, house fires, post-traumatic stress of losing a loved one.

19:41A striptease is a wonderful thing. Your wife might do a striptease to seduce you. I take

19:46issue with the whole stripping thing per se because women have been forced into prostitution

19:50via stripping. Men get girls doing modelling first, then they force manipulate them with

19:55money stress to strip off in front of a camera, then in front of people, then get them doing

20:00lap dances, then force them into porn, prostitution with a goal of having them chained to a bed

20:05in a brothel. Men will use any means necessary, money, drugs or any other method they can

20:10think of and the police are protecting prostitution. Because they don't allow local people to take

20:15these brothels apart. Because centralised and localised at times, police oversight doesn't

20:21allow local people to take these brothels apart. There is not enough determination to

20:25get results. Police should be non-stop on this and keep pushing at governments for powers

20:30to get it done.

20:32International Men's Day has been confirmed to be held on the day men stop forcing women

20:36to be prostitutes, then pretending they actually want to. Also known as rape. Stop the rape

20:42of women of all species. Stop the rape of women of all species. So are the nice men

20:48of the world out demonstrating against the police for protecting prostitution? No. Are

20:52they out demonstrating against the government for not telling the police to protect women

20:56who are being raped? No. So are they out confronting pimps with a don't take no for an answer attitude

21:02and freeing women from brothels? No. They're not attacking the pimps ability to operate

21:07are they? No, because the police will stop them. Oh, so do they deserve a day of their

21:13own? No. What is the problem with men and getting prostitution stopped? Of course a

21:21simple answer to get prostitution stopped is to fully camera all buildings worldwide

21:25and utilise computer algorithmical analysis to stop certain behaviours, but men do not

21:30want this as it would make all women and children safe and disband all brothels worldwide. They

21:35certainly make all the wrong excuses for not doing this. So anyway, wives do not feel

21:41comfortable doing a strip tease for their man because all said wife can think about

21:46is a forcibly drug-addled waif taking cocks in a brothel, perhaps. But men want babies

21:53and sex and respect for their emotions. So anyway, the word strip tease, well you might

21:58have to do away with the word strip for a start perhaps, due to women being monetarily

22:03forced to do so. Tease. It's a wonderful thing if your wife does a strip tease for

22:08you. It is nice to be teased in a loving fun way. She may tease you with her allure, which

22:14seems wonderful. It is in theory a nice application of the word tease. But another application

22:20of the word tease is what happens to children, to people, just before they commit suicide.

22:25They get teased for years sometimes, or even just for a short period of time, before they

22:30then take their own life. So teasing results in people dying, basically. So on the face

22:36of it, a tease can be nice. But can the word tease ever be applied in a nice way? So we

22:43compartmentalise in our minds the good stroke bad definitionals and lock up people in lunatic

22:49asylums, I mean psych wards, I mean sanatoriums, I mean hospitals, anyone whom can't compartmentalise

22:55horrid stuff from good stuff that utilises the same word. I think feminists of the world

23:01would agree with me on the idea that tease, as a word, needs to go. The word allure for

23:06instance is nice, it is alluring, but allures have been used in fishing to murder and suffocate

23:13and torture for extended periods of time when they go through the throwback cycle of man's

23:16murderous history, thrown back for generations with ripped lips, and worse. So a woman would

23:24allure you into her clutches as part of an extended murder-based terminology for sex.

23:30Apparently there is always more fish in the sea. Are we talking about murder or finding

23:35a partner? So murder, death, suffering, torture and, in fish farms, rape, is wrapped around

23:43the very language we speak. Also, there are not plenty more fish in the sea these days.

23:50I would say that I am a very staunch feminist myself, and this concept of my affiliation

23:55is very true, despite the fact I am a man. It is ok to be a feminist if you are a man.

24:01Not sure I could utilise the word staunch though, because don't people staunch the flow

24:05of blood when their partner is bleeding out due to an accident in their non-camered workshop

24:10that is filled with illegally dangerous engineering equipment that is maybe exempt from seizure

24:14due to man's indifference to accidental amputation, a medical term used for arterial damage blood

24:20loss being used for the concept of being enthusiastic about something. I am not enthusiastic about

24:26the utilisation of the word staunch for any reasons other than the medical application.

24:31So you can't hear the word staunch these days, because as he was dying from his chest wound

24:36he was screaming, staunch the flow of blood, over and over, but you couldn't. Multiple

24:41definitions of words can be disturbing and scary, can elicit post-traumatic stress, like

24:47losing someone in a house fire. Does anyone care though? Maybe not the shrink handling

24:52your sectioning review. You'll have to learn to utilise, he's learnt a little, words the

24:58way they do out there, or we can't ok your release. Sorry. I try to utilise the word

25:04utilise rather than the word use, as whores in brothels and women in society get used,

25:10also known as abused. We need to look at the English language in a lot of depth, like

25:15an autistic child reading a dictionary and a room of socially inept abusive users of

25:20language, I mean normal language usage people. But of course nutters and autistic people

25:26are too soft. In my opinion the world needs to be soft. Can we do away with the phrase

25:32to be too soft? And according to generic Microsoft thesaurus lambast means stick a knife into,

25:41castigate, haul over hot coals. And people wonder why they are not liked by said soft

25:47people. In my opinion the world needs to be soft. People will then stop committing suicide

25:53and getting upset. People will actually start to be happy. We can start off the happiness

25:59transformation with the socio-psychological effects of language and word abusage that

26:03autistic children have been trying to explain to their parents, or that inpatients have

26:08been trying to explain to their psychiatrists. And words like effeminate and emasculate not

26:14being used by such institutions as Oxford Languages, whom are involved in the formulation

26:19of the Oxford English Dictionary, to spread widespread sexist thought conditioning, data

26:23formulaic amongst the intelligentsia, I mean people whom like words, of the world. Socio-psychologic

26:30effects of language and word usage on our psyches, well-beings. Word ride, riding a

26:37horse, slave word, to be removed upon full feministic review of dictionary. The word

26:43mad is offensive, but I'm mad about the word mad, you slut. I'm mad about you, you sick

26:50bitch hoe. Swearing ban. I don't have time for swearing. All swear words to be banned.

26:57The removal of all negative social modes, negative language social goads. Swear work

27:03frame words don't work happily in me. Our muse to stories we tell aren't improved by

27:09negative embellishment. Having lovely, loving embellishments is a key part of future storytelling.

27:15All sonical phrase builds are resonational positivity, coalesced, incarnationalised,

27:21analogously. Word shot, shooting. So taking some photos, taking some shots, like in football,

27:29you take a shot at goal. Shot being a word related to the noun shotput, a large metal

27:34ball used in cannons, but now being utilised for sports people to throw. The shot being

27:40the object thrown, not the act of throwing or shooting. Shotguns use shot, which is small

27:45ball bearings that have a devastating effect when ripping through flesh. So a sanitisation

27:51of a military term brought into common speech. How men dare to use such phrases and terms

27:57in common speech is difficult to understand. We have to separate military terms from our

28:02day to day reality. If in our future we will be required to fight an alien foe not of our

28:08super species, then military terms or a specialised military language would preferably be utilised

28:14in our defence. We certainly do not want our day to day language to be a triggering

28:18factor in our lives as regards trauma memories of a future war where we used normal language.

28:25And then the common usage of this language would make us remember very traumatic experiences.

28:30This would taint this new lovely language and our lives. Certainly when we talk to each

28:35other and play sport we can't be flippantly using violent and aggressive terms. So the

28:41word trigger I utilised in the previous paragraph is such a word that would have to be reserved

28:46for a new military language as regards its word concept and never be used again in common

28:51speech. All military terms being reserved and not filtering into our common language

28:56and speech, putting a clear line between the two, between weapons and fighting and technology

29:04and loving culture. Sport is not war, but like so many happenstances in life, men seek

29:11to militarise and martialise everything and everyone in their pursuit of psychological

29:16domination of each other, women and children. And technology itself does not escape the

29:21clutches of disgustingness and not giving a shit. Assault and battery is ok as regards

29:27its common word usage. An assault on the senses can be wonderful, apparently, but not to the

29:33woman that has just had her nose rearranged as men like to lovingly put it. She has been

29:38battered like so many generations of women before her by men who think it is ok to call

29:43an electron storage unit a battery. And the battery must have power, like the power a

29:49husband has over his wife, like the power the political elite have over suicide rates

29:54upon policies they introduce, knowing people will top themselves. Maybe such terms need

30:00to be hung out to dry, but of course the army's cavalry, also known as horse slave corps,

30:06must charge forwards and trample and decimate in its domination of femininity, as the battered

30:12wife must be charged with non-provision of marital services, as the battery must charge

30:17or be thrown in the bin. Man ends up in a cell of his own creation on this one. Girls

30:24want these terms gone now.

30:27Criticise the behaviour, not the individual. You can't use abusive behaviour, stroke language,

30:33as facility to end abuse. The abused do not want to be defended by abusers. This is an

30:38ideal that can't always be implemented though, because it is dependent upon the severity

30:43of continued ongoing abuse. After the fact, in retrospect, those that will be freed from

30:48the destructive control mechanisms of man will look back and deem abusive behaviour

30:53used to establish those freedoms as mistakes, but this is also dependent upon the severity

30:58of the abuse that has been suffered. It is true that we are at war, but we must try to

31:03not become abusive and just use truthful information without insult whenever we possibly can. Criticise

31:09the behaviour, not the individual, is an ideal very worth aspiring to. To call a rapist a

31:15rapist is factually accurate, and whilst all perpetrators are themselves victims of being

31:20traumatised, abused and raped by this world's inheritance, but when abuse is still ongoing

31:26victims will lash out to protect themselves using any means at their disposal. Women rip

31:31out the throats of men who pin them down. They scream and claw and kill to protect themselves

31:36as we all would. But when men use every tool at their disposal, including politics, legislation,

31:42lack of legislation, language, physical force and rape, monetary forcing, it is no wonder

31:48that women get angry to the point of wanting to utilise any means necessary to end man's

31:53abusive behaviour. We demand action from men now. Get out of the way! So the interaction

32:01that helps create a new and beautiful future for all women and men does not require insults

32:05or abusive behaviour, and we need to get there as soon as possible. The abused are fed up

32:10with being forced to react seemingly abusively, and defending against ongoing attack can't

32:15be called abuse. The attackers' abusers have to stop their behaviours before defenders

32:21will stop defending themselves. Men have portrayed women to be somehow responsible for the abuse

32:27they have received, and their defence stance has been negativised by the law industry to

32:32free men from prosecutions and relevant judgements. Constantly helping victims. Constantly being

32:39forced to help victims or being forced to try to get unfeeling governments to help victims

32:43is not an approach that creates successful outcomes. We have to help those who perpetrate

32:48suffering upon others to change so that people are not harmed in the first place. We have

32:53to accept that perpetrators are victims of their own behaviour just as much as those

32:57they consciously or subconsciously victimise. The victims themselves can't be thought of

33:02as victims, maybe. Victims can't be expected to accept this label as they have done nothing

33:07wrong, so why should they? Maybe the real victims of society are those who hurt others.

33:12They are labelled perpetrators, and rightly so, as their behaviour is destructive and

33:16harmful. I would say that, just as much as people who have been harmed by this reality

33:21by the perpetrators that live within it, the perpetrators themselves are victims of the

33:26circumstances of the history of this reality, and the indoctrinating effects of badly behaved

33:31people and a violence accepting culture that can't be called a culture. An example of this

33:37is women and men not being listened to, so needing through desperation to cause uncaring

33:42men to understand by acting out behaviours that girls themselves see as self-destructive

33:47in nature. Behaviours directed through desperation towards themselves, their relationships and

33:53society itself. This societal trauma inheritance has tainted itself within all our society

33:59and behaviours, and we now have the onerous task of extricating ourselves from this history

34:03of pseudo-behaviours that serve no purpose in a new world of love and fidelity. Going

34:09forwards in the way we get change to happen, we have to hold all the perpetrating behaviours

34:13to account. There is no other way we can create a loving and wonderful society. But we must

34:19recognise that we are all victims of this world we were born into, and that we were

34:23all babies who were harmed by the violent and uncaring tropes that have forged human

34:27collective disassociation from morality and compassion. And indeed we can all refuse to

34:33be thought of as victims even though we all are. We have all been affected but now is

34:39the time to move forwards in love only. And when women worldwide group together utilising

34:45their right to petition, girls will realise that the world of pure love and cuddly joyousness

34:50is about to happen. We can make this happen girls if we just love together and vote together

34:56as one cuddly unit of feminine togetherness. An outcome of feminine loving influence is

35:01essential and inevitable within our planet earth mother.

Category

Transcript

Comments

Recommended