收35万令吉“交白卷”   丹麦艺术家被法院下令还钱！ - video Dailymotion

Hotspot热点

新闻报报看 | 丹麦艺术家哈宁数10年前以钞票作画闻名，然而前年收了博物馆逾53万丹麦克朗重制画作时，却交上两张白纸，被馆长告上庭要求还钱。哈宁表示，这两幅画的名称跟他的行为一样，就是“拿了钱就跑”。他也承认故意“交白卷”，目的是想鼓励其他工作条件跟他一样悲惨的人，像他这样勇敢违约。（主播：蔡心惠、洪欣仪）

Transcript

00:00 Art is not something everyone knows,

00:04 so it's easy to cause controversy.

00:06 A few years ago, an Italian artist

00:08 put a banana on the wall

00:10 and sold it for $120,000,

00:13 which is equivalent to $560,000.

00:15 At the time, there was a controversy.

00:17 A Danish artist named Hanin

00:20 went even further.

00:21 In 2021, she was entrusted with the museum

00:24 and used 532,000 Danish kroner,

00:27 which is equivalent to $350,000,

00:30 to create two paintings.

00:32 The result was a stunning work.

00:36 Yes, her work is this blank canvas.

00:40 Hanin's name for this painting is also very famous.

00:44 It's called "Running with Money".

00:47 Why is the name of this painting

00:49 "Running with Money" so famous?

00:52 The story starts in 2007.

00:55 Hanin wanted to raise money for Denmark,

00:58 so she filled the canvas with Danish kroner.

01:03 The painting was named "Danish Average Annual Income".

01:07 In 2010 and 2011,

01:10 she re-enacted the painting with European Yuan.

01:14 The painting was called "Austrian Income".

01:17 Although the process of making these two paintings

01:19 sounds very casual,

01:21 she did successfully make a name for these two paintings locally.

01:26 Ten years later,

01:28 Hanin was entrusted with the Danish Aalborg Modern Art Museum

01:31 and asked to re-create the two paintings.

01:35 But she didn't expect to hand in the blank canvas directly this time.

01:41 Hanin has her explanation for these two paintings.

01:44 She said she did receive money but did not do anything.

01:47 So these two paintings are called "Running with Money".

01:50 But she said this is not a theft.

01:52 At most, she can only say it is a breach of contract.

01:54 And the breach of contract is also a part of this painting.

01:57 She hopes to encourage other people with the same miserable conditions

02:00 as her to bravely breach the contract through this painting.

02:04 A good sentence, "Bravely breach the contract".

02:07 But this explanation made the museum's curator very dissatisfied

02:11 and angered her and the exhibition's staff.

02:13 But the curator did not deny that Hanin was very humorous.

02:16 But they still decided to display these two blank paintings.

02:20 Although the paintings were displayed,

02:22 Hanin still had to pay for them.

02:24 But Hanin insisted on not paying,

02:26 so the curator sued the court.

02:28 After more than two years of litigation,

02:30 Copenhagen court yesterday ruled that

02:32 Hanin must pay back 490,000 kroner,

02:34 which is about 330,000 ringgit.

02:36 This is the remaining cost after deducting the expenses

02:39 required to produce these two paintings.

02:42 Hanin did not plan to appeal after she was found guilty.

02:45 [Music]

收35万令吉“交白卷” 丹麦艺术家被法院下令还钱！

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended