Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 years ago
'NOT MY WIFE' Says Harry! PROOF That It's NOT Meghan In Family July 4th Photo HEAVILY PHOTOSHOPPED

Category

People
Transcript
00:00 "Not my wife," says Harry, proof that it's not Meghan in the family July 4 photo.
00:07 Meghan Markle and her two-year-old daughter Lilibet were spotted waving enthusiastically
00:11 at the 4th of July parade to mark U.S. Independence Day in Montecito.
00:16 A video shared on the official Instagram handle of Rosewood Miramar Beach Hotel shows Meghan
00:22 and Lilibet at the roadside as they watch the Model T Fords drive by and waved at the
00:26 participants.
00:28 In the video, Meghan was crouched down to keep a close arm around Lilibet.
00:32 Meghan appeared to be wearing light-wash flare jeans with a white tee and black and white
00:37 sweater tied around her neck.
00:39 Earlier, Lilibet was also pictured in the arms of her father, Prince Harry, at the parade.
00:45 Commenting on the post, one fan said, "I see Meghan and Lilibet."
00:48 Another said, "Meghan and her family," followed by numerous heart emojis.
00:53 Meanwhile, some claims this is not Meghan, with Celt News on YouTube doing a video on
00:58 the Sussexes and kids for the 4th of July.
01:01 She also posted the cleaned up picture of Meghan and Lily, and it's absolutely not
01:06 Meghan.
01:07 She said, "Take a look at the teeth and they're definitely not Meghan's.
01:11 As it's not her, it's obvious.
01:13 And take a look at the child, not any of the children we've seen so far.
01:17 A completely different one yet again.
01:19 We're supposed to believe that this is Lily."
01:22 The hair isn't even red.
01:23 The hair's changed from one photograph to the next on the same day, from red to blonde.
01:28 So when Harry holds his child, the hair turns red.
01:31 When Meghan holds the child, it turns blonde.
01:34 Many fans believe that Harry and Meghan's July 4th photos are photoshopped, and Kel also
01:39 believes this.
01:40 She said, "There's no doubt that these photos have been photoshopped to the extreme.
01:45 Several other YouTubers have put out the metadata showing that it was put through Adobe Photoshop
01:50 and takes from the actual original photo that was taken from a phone."
01:55 She added, "And someone pointed out that the two children standing beside her look
01:59 like sisters and look like her due to the shape of their heads and their features."
02:04 Apparently, in this photo, the vehicle there was not used in the 2023 July 4th parade,
02:10 only in the 2022 one.
02:13 So that confirms that the photo is a year old, unless they photoshopped the vehicle
02:17 in and it's not even Meghan in the photo, nor Lily, and probably a fake Harry and Archie
02:22 as they were each photoshopped separately into this photo.
02:26 Agreeing with Kelt, one person wrote, "They're so stupid, making bigger asses of themselves
02:32 every time they produce these very amateurish attempts of photoshopping.
02:36 Lies, lies, lies."
02:38 A second commented, "Oh the desperation for press attention.
02:42 How low they've sunk if this is all they can come up with.
02:45 The children are now their only means of getting press attention.
02:49 It may have worked this time, the endless photoshopping and fake internet accounts and
02:53 puff pieces about Meghan and her future plans are all becoming extremely boring and tiresome.
03:00 If the children exist, then I don't believe they're of any body born and it's for the
03:04 time for King Giles to act as his popularity is beginning to wane in the UK as he dithers."
03:10 A third said, "These photographs are ridiculous.
03:13 Who in their right mind would take a red haired and very fair skinned child out in the California
03:18 80+ sunshine without a hat on?
03:21 But Harry or his lookalikes wear a cap to protect their bare scalp."
03:25 Another added, "I agree about the faux Meghan's teeth.
03:28 They don't look at all like her teeth.
03:30 The smile's more genuine and gentle.
03:32 Can't think of a better word than the smiles we're used to seeing."
03:36 Thank you.
03:37 [BLANK_AUDIO]
Comments

Recommended