Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 3/8/2017
Merkel took a selfie with one of the perpetrators.”
“Regarding the ruling, we are pleased that the court shares our view
that the legal action initiated was not merited or the most effective way to resolve the situation.”
“We quickly disabled access to content that has been accurately reported to us by Mr. Modamani’s legal representatives,” the statement
added, “and will continue to respond quickly to valid reports of the content at issue from Mr. Modamani’s legal representatives.”
A court in Hamburg rejected that suit last year, but a court in Munich is examining it.
“This question was disputed by the parties and could not be clarified in the hearing,”
the judge said, suggesting it could be answered in a separate trial if pursued.
“We learned a lot from this case,” Mr. Jun said after the ruling.
He said the security detail had been ordered after an anonymous call several weeks earlier in which the person threatened to murder him
and cited information that Mr. Jun said only an insider could have known.
In Mr. Modamani’s case, such information was crucial, as simply erasing the original version of the disputed image would not ensure
that it could no longer be found elsewhere on the platform.
But we have learned which laws have to be changed.”
It shows a copy of Mr. Modamani’s original selfie with the chancellor, alongside images of the three men.

Category

🗞
News

Recommended