Nidhi Razdan disrespects Indian Constitution
- 9 years ago
NDTV will have a stiff competition with NDTV if one were to prepare a list of top ten stupidest, dumbest statements blurted out on national TV.
A debate regarding government ban on a few porn sites (streaming child porn and alike) was conducted on it yesterday.
An anchor is supposed to stay neutral & bring forward important views of the panelists but NDTV anchor Nidhi Razdan was desperate to force her own. Visibly frustrated, she utters words of wisdom unheard before
- Men SHOULD sleep with other men or animals etc
- Lots of Indian laws are stupid (laws come from constitution, calling them stupid is clearly a disrespect to our constitution)
One fails to understand, why they are so desperate to support the social evil of porn?
Be it rapists of Nirbhaya, be it that of a six year old girl in Delhi ... They all confessed to have been aroused beyond control by watching porn.
If porn doesn't incite rapist tendencies then it must be definitely just the weather and wind speed and stock market conditions coupled with atmospheric pressure.
Just watch this one minute clip to see her facial expressions clearly betraying any neutrality she is supposed to hold as an anchor in a TV debate.
A debate regarding government ban on a few porn sites (streaming child porn and alike) was conducted on it yesterday.
An anchor is supposed to stay neutral & bring forward important views of the panelists but NDTV anchor Nidhi Razdan was desperate to force her own. Visibly frustrated, she utters words of wisdom unheard before
- Men SHOULD sleep with other men or animals etc
- Lots of Indian laws are stupid (laws come from constitution, calling them stupid is clearly a disrespect to our constitution)
One fails to understand, why they are so desperate to support the social evil of porn?
Be it rapists of Nirbhaya, be it that of a six year old girl in Delhi ... They all confessed to have been aroused beyond control by watching porn.
If porn doesn't incite rapist tendencies then it must be definitely just the weather and wind speed and stock market conditions coupled with atmospheric pressure.
Just watch this one minute clip to see her facial expressions clearly betraying any neutrality she is supposed to hold as an anchor in a TV debate.