Advertising Console

    9/11 Truth: NIST Report Debunked

    Repost
    BadKitty

    by BadKitty

    71
    30 742 views

    11 comments

    Decisivebaniste840
    UPDATE: u.to/EdfODQ > (HQ version)
    Immenserecluse8165
    ?That link did not play -- use this version :: www.pepij.nl/885748/
    Numerousdespera776
    ?UPDATE: That link didn't work use this link :: http://link.mx/przYs
    engineer1989
    It doesn't matter how long it would take to rig the building. It's just that explosives are the only explanation for the speed of fall of WTC 1, 2 and 7. The speed is the only thing that cannot be debunked or hidden. Not quite free-fall, due to air resistance between floors, but as fast as other controlled demolitions. See equations of physics of falling bodies with air resistance, on wikipedia and nasa.gov, or a physics book.
    Reading the NIST report was the last straw for me (admitting free-fall speed). The speed of fall requires the structure had been removed, or else the collapses would have occurred in a much longer time, to allow upper falling floors to impact (and thus be slowed down) by lower floors The collapse time of each building would then have taken many times longer than free fall, instead of a few seconds.
    By engineer19895 years ago
    batvette
    No, by "mess" I mean the time and disruption and debris you'd have everywhere at the time you rigged all those explosives on nearly every beam on every floor. It woul take dozens of men months using dozens of truckloads of explosives and violate the workspace of thousands of people doing it.
    Ridiculous.
    By batvette6 years ago
    Show more comments